2019
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified gravity away from a ΛCDM background

Abstract: Within the effective field theory approach to cosmic acceleration, the background expansion can be specified separately from the gravitational modifications. We explore the impact of modified gravity in a background different from a cosmological constant plus cold dark matter (ΛCDM) on the stability and cosmological observables, including covariance between gravity and expansion parameters. In No Slip Gravity the more general background allows more gravitational freedom, including both positive and negative Pl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CMB, BAO, SNIa and RSD datasets constrain indeed α M to be negative as shown in Figure 14. Remarkably a negative running of the Planck mass at z 1 does not prevent the model to produce lower growth relative to the standard model nor a positive ISW-galaxy cross-correlation [201].…”
Section: Running Planck Massmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CMB, BAO, SNIa and RSD datasets constrain indeed α M to be negative as shown in Figure 14. Remarkably a negative running of the Planck mass at z 1 does not prevent the model to produce lower growth relative to the standard model nor a positive ISW-galaxy cross-correlation [201].…”
Section: Running Planck Massmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Pace, G. Papadomanolakis, S. Peirone and D. Vernieri for useful discussions. We acknowledge the authors of [155,131,101,169,79,68,100,158,173,167,186,187,140,195,194,198,201,199,209,106,214,141,216,219,217,168,130,305,306] for the permission to use their figures and we would like to thank also G. Brando…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we turn to the scalar-tensor theory (1.1), and similarly ask for what values of the EFT couplings is there an obstruction to resummation in the classical theory or to UV completion in the quantum theory? Scalar-tensor theories in this Horndeski class (and its generalisations) form the basis of recent model-independent parameterised approaches that systematically explore modified gravity effects in linear cosmology [20][21][22][23][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126], resulting in various cosmological constraints on deviations from GR [23,[127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146]. (1.1) is also the theory previously studied in [92,93] and has the convenient feature that positivity bounds can be mapped directly onto constraints on the effective parameters which control linearised cosmological perturbations [23].…”
Section: Horndeski Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore of interest to understand if the hints for MG we found above are driven by such feature. The MGCLASS code allows to manually impose Σ(k, z) = 1, reducing the free MG parameters to only those determining µ(k, z) [78] and obtaining the third function as…”
Section: Assuming No Lensing Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%