Packed-column supercritical-fluid chromatography (pSFC) and related chromatography (e.g. subcritical-fluid or superheated-water chromatography) have a great deal to offer and are under-utilised techniques [1,2]. Column equilibration and analysis times are shorter than in liquid chromatography (LC). Moreover, separations are often different from and complementary to those obtained in LC [3][4][5][6][7][8]. pSFC mainly uses LC-like detectors, such as UV, evaporative light-scattering detection (ELSD) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], or atmospheric-pressure ionisation mass-spectrometry (API-MS) [2,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] including ionspray or electrospray (IS-MS) and atmospheric-pressure chemical-ionisation mass spectrometry (APCI-MS). ELSD and API-MS are low-pressure detectors especially appropriate to non-UV-absorbing analytes. They both require nebulization and vaporization of the mobile phase. For this reason, ELSD was proven to be a good and inexpensive approach for method development in LC [28][29][30]. Transposition of separation methods from LC-ELSD to LC-API-MS was successful. For pSFC, the transposition is more complex because of the necessity to regulate pressure. API-MS interfaces are commonly modified to incorporate the restrictor at the end of the MS source capillary [9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, in the case of APCI-MS, an unmodified LC interface has recently been introduced for pSFC with pure-CO 2 mobile phase [2].In the present work, with CO 2 -modifier mobile-phases, the ELSD interface design was studied with the intention of placing the restrictor at the column outlet inside the oven. Test solutes were methylated glucoses [7] and methylated-β-cyclodextrins (MβCD) [6,31]. MβCD are cyclic glucose oligomers methylated in various positions which are difficult to characterize. Once the interface design was optimized, pSFC-ELSD conditions were directly applied to pSFC-APCI-MS to provide structural information on complex MβCD mixtures.
ExperimentalSFC analyses were conducted with an SF3 system (Gilson, Villiers-le-Bel, France) including CO 2 and modifier pumps, a 7125 injection valve with 20 µl sample loop (Rheodyne, Berkeley, CA, USA), and a Croco-Cil TM column oven (CILCluzeau, Sainte-Foy-la-Grande, France). The columns used were Zorbax Sil, 7 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm (Dupont, Wilmington, DE, USA) and Nucleosil NO 2 ,10 µm × 4.6 × 150 mm (Shandon, Cheshire, UK).The ELSD Sedex 55 (Sedere, Alfortville, France) was used with SFC or LC interface. First experiments were made with the commercial ELSD-SFC interface (Fig. 1a) equipped with a linear restrictor (fused silica, 5 cm length, 50 µm ID). For the study of the interface design, this restrictor was placed inside the oven at the column outlet, and a nebulization capillary (5 cm length; either fused silica, 50, 75 or 100 µm ID; or PEEK, 130 or 180 µm ID) was used as the SFC interface (Fig. 1b). A PEEK tubing (75 cm length, 130 µm ID) was used as the transfer line between t...