2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-022-07392-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Johnson–Cook Constitutive Model of 18CrNiMo7-6 Alloy Steel under Ultrasonic Surface Burnishing Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 1) has the coefficient for controlling the strain rate sensitivity C, which was assumed to be constant in the previous analysis. To relieve the constant condition, similar works reported the parameters as function of strain rate and/or temperature [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Analysis Of Jc Parameters Considering the Quasi-static Behav...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 1) has the coefficient for controlling the strain rate sensitivity C, which was assumed to be constant in the previous analysis. To relieve the constant condition, similar works reported the parameters as function of strain rate and/or temperature [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Analysis Of Jc Parameters Considering the Quasi-static Behav...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, researchers have proposed various modified versions of the JC hardening model in different ways. In many instances, modifications were introduced to the work hardening and strain rate hardening terms, aiming to enhance the precision of predictions under plastic deformation of metallic materials [29][30][31][32][33]. Additionally, in some cases, adjustments were made to the heat softening term by incorporating conditions that specifically consider the temperature causing the recovery and/or recrystallization [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars have developed material constitutive models to characterize the deformed behaviors of material based on experimental law. Liu et al [ 17 ] obtained the conventional J-C model of 18CrNiMo7-6 alloy steel by mechanical experiments at different strain rates. It found that the conventional J-C constitutive model could not precisely forecast the flow stress under high strain rate loading conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y. Wang et al [24] modified the JC model with a new temperature term, and the error between the prediction data of the model and the experimental results was within 5%. Compared with all the research discussed above, the JC parameter study of ball burnishing has been rarely reported [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%