“…In all studies, Kudo pit patterns III–V were considered suspicious for neoplasia, whereas Kudo pit patterns I–II were combined and considered non-neoplastic as previously described in the non-IBD literature. 55 When the frequency of these groups of pit patterns was clearly reported (2296 lesions – 19% neoplastic, from 13 studies; Table 2), 6,7,12,13,15,16,20,22,23,28,34,40,42 most lesions (65%) had non-neoplastic type I–II pits, whereas 26% were suspicious for neoplasia (Kudo III–V patterns). However, when the Kudo patterns were compared to histology (1645 lesions from 12 studies clearly reporting the rates of true and false positives/negatives), 6,7,12,13,15,16,20,22,23,28,40,42 4% of Kudo I–II patterns were neoplastic, whereas only 44% of Kudo III–V were neoplastic.…”