2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-011-0740-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified-modal-pushover-based seismic optimum design for steel structures considering life-cycle cost

Abstract: A modified-modal-pushover-based optimization technique is presented to design steel moment resisting frame buildings for minimizing the life-cycle cost based on the framework of performance based earthquake engineering. Modified modal pushover analysis (MMPA) procedure capturing the higher mode effect well is utilized to analyze the inelastic seismic demands of the structures subjected to the considered design earthquakes in terms of the Chinese seismic code for buildings, especially for the medium-to high-ris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The references of Table 1 present the expected loss ratios for buildings under the earthquake excitations. Because these ratios are dimensionless, they have been used in different sites (e.g., previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7] ).…”
Section: Life-cycle Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The references of Table 1 present the expected loss ratios for buildings under the earthquake excitations. Because these ratios are dimensionless, they have been used in different sites (e.g., previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7] ).…”
Section: Life-cycle Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] Therefore, in recent studies, the life‐cycle cost has been the seismic optimization goal of designing the control system for retrofitting (or seismic design) the structures. [ 2–9 ] Mitropoulou and Lagaros [ 3 ] investigated the performance and cost of seismic isolators using life‐cycle cost analysis. They showed that although the seismic isolator system is expensive, the life‐cycle cost is less than its fixed counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such problems include the sizing of individual members (sizing optimization problems), the selection of the most efficient placing of structural members (topology optimization) or a combination of both in order to achieve a single or multiple goals at the same time (multiobjective optimization). The existing literature is rich of papers proposing and applying optimization algorithms in structural problems [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Application On Structural Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application to reinforced concrete (RC) frames illustrated that the proposed methodology can achieve a significant reduction of the direct construction cost and improved seismic performances. Zou et al (2007) and Li et al (2012) developed the optimization technique for minimizing the life-cycle cost using the nonlinear static pushover analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using nonlinear static pushover analysis as a optimization tool has been widely investigated (e.g. Ganzerli et al, 2000;Li et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2003Liu et al, , 2005Zou and Chan, 2005;Zou et al, 2007) since it can predict the structural seismic demands with acceptable accuracy and easy operation, as well as can avoid the confusion of selecting suitable ground motion as the seismic input for structural nonlinear optimization because different ground motion inputs can result in different final optimum solutions. Nevertheless, there is no investigation on the inelastic structural optimization for uniform damage design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%