2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/165424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Negative Staining of Heine for Fast and Inexpensive Screening of Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, and Cystoisospora spp.

Abstract: Negative staining technique of Heine is an easy, inexpensive, and rapid way of screening for coccidian parasites of the intestinal tract. But its use as a routine technique for screening of Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, and Cystoisospora is restricted due to its sensitivity being lower than the gold standard method of modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining. This paper emphasises the modification of original Heine staining technique which has been attempted in order to increase the sensitivity and detection of oocysts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the first human cryptosporidiosis cases, few studies on oocysts' behavior in fecal samples submitted to any temporary staining technique have been published. The major advances include using a direct wet mount (Garcia et al, 1982) or adding iodine (Ma & Soave, 1983), Schiff''s Periodic Acid (Horen, 1983), or Hein's staining protocol, which contains carbol fuchsin (Heine, 1982) and its modification with malachite green (Khanna et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first human cryptosporidiosis cases, few studies on oocysts' behavior in fecal samples submitted to any temporary staining technique have been published. The major advances include using a direct wet mount (Garcia et al, 1982) or adding iodine (Ma & Soave, 1983), Schiff''s Periodic Acid (Horen, 1983), or Hein's staining protocol, which contains carbol fuchsin (Heine, 1982) and its modification with malachite green (Khanna et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the aid of conventional staining methods for Cyclospora oocysts microscopic detection can be challenging (McHardy et al, 2014), but it remains the recommended diagnostic method. Of the various available stains, the modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain technique has been recommended for detecting Cyclospora oocysts in clinical samples (Brennan et al, 1996;Khanna et al, 2014).…”
Section: Staining Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up, among the various available detection methods of Cyclospora oocyst based on morphology, the modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining and autofluorescence techniques have been recommended for the detection of oocysts in the clinical samples (Berlin et al, 1998;Khanna et al, 2014).…”
Section: Flow Cytometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published data from the French CNR-LE for cryptosporidiosis show that: i) even with around 250 notified cases each year, cryptosporidiosis is still largely underestimated in France, ii) cryptosporidiosis is predominant in immunocompetent individuals and especially in young children and young adults, and iii) cryptosporidiosis is over-represented in the summer [ 5 , 6 ]. The routine diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis still relies on light microscopy examination for many laboratories [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. However, light microscopy examination lacks sensitivity, is time-consuming, and requires skilled technicians, making it an inefficient method for laboratories which are able to switch to PCR analysis [ 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%