2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2020.102306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified output and learner uptake in casual online learner-learner conversation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, except for the quasiexperiment exploration, some researchers (e.g., Azara and Nasiri, 2014;Lin and Yu, 2017;Krishnan et al, 2020;Togaibayeva et al, 2022) tried to probe learners' attitude toward these mobile-assisted technologies to explore their effectiveness, and found that most EFL learners have positive attitudes toward mobile-assisted devices. Moreover, empirical studies taking other L2s such as Turkish (Loewen et al, 2019), Spanish (Loewen et al, 2020), and German (Salomonsson, 2020) also got similar findings. All in all, the expanding body of research indicated that mobile-assisted learning was significantly positive; however, it has to be mentioned that most studies in this line of research were conducted in short periods (Xodabande and Atai, 2020), which makes it difficult to understand the long-term impacts of mobile-assisted vocabulary learning in general (Lin and Lin, 2019).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Mobile-assisted Vocabulary Learningsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In addition, except for the quasiexperiment exploration, some researchers (e.g., Azara and Nasiri, 2014;Lin and Yu, 2017;Krishnan et al, 2020;Togaibayeva et al, 2022) tried to probe learners' attitude toward these mobile-assisted technologies to explore their effectiveness, and found that most EFL learners have positive attitudes toward mobile-assisted devices. Moreover, empirical studies taking other L2s such as Turkish (Loewen et al, 2019), Spanish (Loewen et al, 2020), and German (Salomonsson, 2020) also got similar findings. All in all, the expanding body of research indicated that mobile-assisted learning was significantly positive; however, it has to be mentioned that most studies in this line of research were conducted in short periods (Xodabande and Atai, 2020), which makes it difficult to understand the long-term impacts of mobile-assisted vocabulary learning in general (Lin and Lin, 2019).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Mobile-assisted Vocabulary Learningsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Thus, this study sheds light on the design of online classes to facilitate L2 learning. Salomonsson (2020) examine the impact of modified output on L2 acquisition in an online German language class. The analysis of peer-to-peer conversations reveals the prevalence of learners modifying their output.…”
Section: The Special Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars outline the limitations of using SMTs for discussion among language learners. Accordingly, Salomonsson (2020), considering self-modified output by learners in an online environment, notes that this differs from F2F interaction since SMTs do not support simultaneous speech. The need to take turns in online communication results in the disruption of spontaneity and can have an inhibiting effect on learners (Zhang, 2021), undermining their enjoyment of the discussion activity (Resnik, 2021) and of the ESP course itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%