2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified paramagnetic beads in a microfluidic system for the determination of zearalenone in feedstuffs samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, the developed system was integrated in microfluidic chips following the scheme displayed in Figure 4, where the simple channel layout of a double-T microchip was used to perform sequentially the immunoreaction and the enzyme reaction by applying a program of electric fields [38]. Another system for the determination of ZEA in feedstuffs samples has been recently reported using a microbiochip microfluidic immunosensor coupled with flow injection (FIA) with Au/SPEs as the working electrode showing good sensitivity and accuracy, and minimizing the use of expensive reagents [39]. Table 4 summarizes the main characteristics reported for the detection of biological toxins using electrochemical magnetoimmunosensors.…”
Section: Detection Of Biological Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the developed system was integrated in microfluidic chips following the scheme displayed in Figure 4, where the simple channel layout of a double-T microchip was used to perform sequentially the immunoreaction and the enzyme reaction by applying a program of electric fields [38]. Another system for the determination of ZEA in feedstuffs samples has been recently reported using a microbiochip microfluidic immunosensor coupled with flow injection (FIA) with Au/SPEs as the working electrode showing good sensitivity and accuracy, and minimizing the use of expensive reagents [39]. Table 4 summarizes the main characteristics reported for the detection of biological toxins using electrochemical magnetoimmunosensors.…”
Section: Detection Of Biological Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Microfluidic devices are capable of performing many different functions, including sample injection and separation, cell sorting and counting, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), species mixing, micro pumping, and microfluidic rectification. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Compared to their large-scale counterparts, miniaturized systems have many important advantages, including a reduced sample and reagent consumption, a more rapid response, an enhanced efficiency, a lower power consumption, an improved sensitivity, lower fabrication and operating costs, greater portability, and the potential for integration with other miniaturized devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ezkerra et al 37 proposed a micropump comprising a deflectable diaphragm and a set of out-of-plane cantilever check valves. The experimental results showed that the micropump achieved a maximum flow rate of 177 ll/min given an effective area of 10 mm 2 , an actuating frequency of 6 Hz and a driving pressure of 200 kPa. Ni et al 38 presented a pneumatic PDMS-based micropump consisting of two in-plane low-leakage check valves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods, however, require expensive equipment, complicated cleanup procedures, preconcentration steps, and skilled operators. The determination of the ZEA is usually also carried out by immunochemical assays, [32,33] which could process many samples per day, but have some drawbacks such as their cost, availability limited to some mycotoxins, and cross-reactivity phenomena that give rise to false positive results. [34] In addition to these, it is possible to meet the analytical methods for the determination of ZEA by utilizing certain sophisticated instruments in screening the literature, as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%