2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/abd5ab
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Path-conservative HLLEM Scheme for Magnetohydrodynamic Solar Wind Simulations

Abstract: The goal of the present work is to solve the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) system of extended generalized Lagrange multiplier (EGLM) formulation with Galilean invariance (G-EGLM MHD equations) through a modified path-conservative HLLEM finite-volume method. A second-order least-squares reconstruction with Venkatakrishnan limiter is employed for state variables, and a solenoidality-preserving condition is considered for the magnetic field with the purpose of magnetic divergence cleaning. The two-stage Runge–Kutta t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= (e.g., Ogino & Walker 1984;Tanaka 1994Tanaka , 1995Powell et al 1999;Feng et al 2010;Fuchs et al 2010Fuchs et al , 2011aGuo 2015;Guo et al 2016;Li et al , 2021aWang et al 2018). The governing MHD equations read,…”
Section: The Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…= (e.g., Ogino & Walker 1984;Tanaka 1994Tanaka , 1995Powell et al 1999;Feng et al 2010;Fuchs et al 2010Fuchs et al , 2011aGuo 2015;Guo et al 2016;Li et al , 2021aWang et al 2018). The governing MHD equations read,…”
Section: The Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 12, we compare the radial speeds and the radial magnetic field polarities at 20R s obtained from the simulated results with those mapped from the in situ measurements near the Earth available in the OMNI archive (King & Papitashvili 2005) by using a ballistic approximation (Yang et al 2012;Feng et al 2017;Li et al , 2021a for both CRs 2177 and 2212. For CR 2177, the modeled results roughly capture four leading speed peaks centered around the longitudes of 25°, 160°, 250°, and 310°, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With the Mapped In Situ Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%