2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Sarhan–Balakrishnan singular bivariate distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post' and is available in Csörgö and Welsh (1989) Kundu and Gupta (2010) Jamalizadeh and Kundu (2013), and Balakrishna and Shiji (2014) analyzed this data. We divided all the data by 100.…”
Section: Example 2 the Data Set Was First Published In 'Washingtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post' and is available in Csörgö and Welsh (1989) Kundu and Gupta (2010) Jamalizadeh and Kundu (2013), and Balakrishna and Shiji (2014) analyzed this data. We divided all the data by 100.…”
Section: Example 2 the Data Set Was First Published In 'Washingtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the same steps as in Theorem 2.2 in [17], one can explicitly obtain the first two terms in last equation and after some algebra get g 0 (x) expression.…”
Section: Bayesian Data Analysis With Emo Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bivariate version of (6.16) for the joint distribution function is given by 17) where the function Using the above notations and relations, we list properties of d-EMO models which are not necessarily exchangeable. The statements are analogous to the corresponding properties of EMO models obtained in Sect.…”
Section: Model Specification and Basic Probabilistic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Sarhan and Balakrishnan [10] suggested a bivariate distribution that is more flexible than the bivariate exponential distribution. Later, this distribution was modified by Kundu and Gupta [11]. Kundu and Gupta [11,12] introduced the bivariate generalized exponential and bivariate proportional reversed hazard distributions, respectively, and argued its different properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%