2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-04716-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified sine cosine algorithm-based fuzzy-aided PID controller for automatic generation control of multiarea power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental characteristic of the SSCO algorithm is that the algorithm's procedure is slightly simple mechanism where the design variable is updated using only the mathematical modeling of the sine cosine functions to guide the population to search for global optimal solutions. In SSCO algorithm, the position's updating rule of an agent's population in the design space is formulated in accordance to the following equation [19][20][21]:…”
Section: Ssco Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fundamental characteristic of the SSCO algorithm is that the algorithm's procedure is slightly simple mechanism where the design variable is updated using only the mathematical modeling of the sine cosine functions to guide the population to search for global optimal solutions. In SSCO algorithm, the position's updating rule of an agent's population in the design space is formulated in accordance to the following equation [19][20][21]:…”
Section: Ssco Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCO algorithm can disclose proficient accuracy in comparison with other well-known nature-inspired optimization algorithms; it is not qualified for very complex problems and is still may face the difficulty of becoming trapped in local optima [21,22]. The modified algorithm is proposed to overcome these shortcomings and to step-up its search capability for solving different real-life problems.…”
Section: Msco Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the studies on the use of LFC to ensure system stability in power systems were examined, it was observed that the determination of the controller parameters plays a major role in achieving successful results. Various evolutionary algorithms, such as genetic algorithm (GA) [3], re y algorithm (FA) [3], population extremal optimization (PEO) [5], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [4,6], hybrid shu ed frog leaping algorithm, teaching-learning based optimization (hybrid SFLA-TLBO) [7], equilibrium optimization algorithm (EOA) [8], grey wolf optimization (GWO) [9], hybrid gravitational-re y (hGFA) [10], differential evolution-arti cial electric eld algorithm (DE-AEFA) [11], Jaya algorithm [12,13], sine-cosine algorithm (SCA) [14,15], lightning ash algorithm (LFA) [16], ant-lion optimization (ALO) [17], and gravitational search algorithm (GSA) [18], have been used to tune the controller parameters. Additionally, different optimization algorithms, such as mine blast algorithm (MBA) [19], salp swarm algorithm (SSA) [20], hybrid moth ame optimization-generalised Hop eld neural network (MFO-GHNN) [21], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) [22], crow search algorithm (CSA) [23,24], marine predator algorithm (MPA) [25],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active disturbance rejection control and MPC have been combined with maintaining the fuel efficiency of TGSOFCs to an expected constant [19]. The PID could not be suitable for the constraints of the nonlinear TGSOFCs [20]. The maximum power point tracking algorithms could not effectively improve the fuel efficiency of the TGSOFC with nonlinear constraints [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%