2022
DOI: 10.3934/jimo.2020147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified spectral PRP conjugate gradient method for solving tensor eigenvalue complementarity problems

Abstract: Tensor eigenvalue complementary problems, as a special class of complementary problems, are the generalization of matrix eigenvalue complementary problems in higher-order. In recent years, tensor eigenvalue complementarity problems have been studied extensively. The research fields of tensor eigenvalue complementarity problems mainly focus on analysis of the theory and algorithms. In this paper, we investigate the solution method for four kinds of tensor eigenvalue complementarity problems with different struc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A spectral conjugate gradient method was designed using the spectral parameter and the conjugate parameter for large-scale UO [31]. A modified spectral PRP conjugate gradient method was presented for solving tensor eigenvalue complementarity problems and the numerical results were compared with the inexact Levenberg-Marquardt method [32]. Note that Table 1 indicates the advantages and evaluation tools of the existing methods of other researchers that can be reconciled and add new concepts into our proposed work.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spectral conjugate gradient method was designed using the spectral parameter and the conjugate parameter for large-scale UO [31]. A modified spectral PRP conjugate gradient method was presented for solving tensor eigenvalue complementarity problems and the numerical results were compared with the inexact Levenberg-Marquardt method [32]. Note that Table 1 indicates the advantages and evaluation tools of the existing methods of other researchers that can be reconciled and add new concepts into our proposed work.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%