2019
DOI: 10.13189/ms.2019.070301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Weighted Sum Method for Decisions with Altered Sources of Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where measurement units vary, the qualification values are standardized. Subsequently, after amalgamating the scores based on the weight of each criterion, the overall score for each potential option is established [20,21,22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where measurement units vary, the qualification values are standardized. Subsequently, after amalgamating the scores based on the weight of each criterion, the overall score for each potential option is established [20,21,22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, for the analysis of the collected data, classic TOPSIS was not capable to consider inputs from two groups of experts. Sorooshian and Parsia [43] also explained this as one of the constraints of existing MADMs; they suggested a supplementary procedure for solving this issue, called decisions with altered sources of information, which will be included in this study. This procedure adds a few sub-steps to the MADM data entry of that can be summarized as: Step 1, construction of a decision matrix with inputs from the main source of information; Step 2, completion of the decision matrix with inputs from the altered source of information; and Step 3, normalizing the decision matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighted sum method, known as the traditional multifactor rating scheme, is a very popular, practical, and easily applicable subjective DM process [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. Kumar and Suresh [58] stated that this procedure includes many DM techniques where every alternative could be scored using relevant factors, wherein every factor is weighted based on its significance.…”
Section: Modified Weighted Sum Methods (Wsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar and Suresh [58] stated that this procedure includes many DM techniques where every alternative could be scored using relevant factors, wherein every factor is weighted based on its significance. In this study, because of the use of different sources of information, management criteria, and infection risk, a modified WSM was used, as presented by Sorooshian and Parsia [59], which was called the WSM, in general, in the study. The authors mentioned x Alternative (A) and y decision Criterion (C) sets, wherein the technique could be algorithmically delineated into five phases as follows:…”
Section: Modified Weighted Sum Methods (Wsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%