2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005jd006898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MODIS aerosol product analysis for data assimilation: Assessment of over‐ocean level 2 aerosol optical thickness retrievals

Abstract: [1] Currently, the Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometers (MODIS) level II aerosol product (MOD04/MYD04) is the best aerosol optical depth product suitable for near-real-time aerosol data assimilation. However, a careful analysis of biases and error variances in MOD04/MYD04 aerosol optical depth product is necessary before implementing the MODIS aerosol product in aerosol forecasting applications. Using 1 year's worth of Sun photometer and MOD04/MYD04 aerosol optical depth (t) data over global oceans, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
401
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(427 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
20
401
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a study is not new, as the relationship between AOD DT−AERONET and ocean surface wind speed has been reported by several studies (e.g., Zhang and Reid, 2006;Shi et al, 2011a;Levy et al, 2013). This study extends the previous analysis to further evaluate the impacts of bubbles relative to the uncertainties in MODIS DT aerosol retrievals under clean marine conditions.…”
Section: Observational Datasupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a study is not new, as the relationship between AOD DT−AERONET and ocean surface wind speed has been reported by several studies (e.g., Zhang and Reid, 2006;Shi et al, 2011a;Levy et al, 2013). This study extends the previous analysis to further evaluate the impacts of bubbles relative to the uncertainties in MODIS DT aerosol retrievals under clean marine conditions.…”
Section: Observational Datasupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Indeed, a series of studies suggests that most of the high bias is related to clouds. However, there is a clear lower boundary condition signal as well, with increasing positive AOD bias with wind speed (e.g., Zhang and Reid, 2006;Shi et al, 2011a). Given that sea salt aerosol production, specular reflection (sun glint), and whitecapping all covary with wind speed, AOD retrievals are a potentially confounded system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many successful applications of these data to global-and regional-scale questions are already presented in the literature. They range from assessing zonal mean or global aerosol short-wave forcing [37][38][39][40][41][42] and regional long-wave forcing [43], to improving aerosol forecasting through data assimilation [44,45], monitoring dust and pollution plume evolution [46,47] and air quality [48,49], mapping aerosol air mass type evolution [50], and validating aerosol transport model AOD simulations [51,52]. In each case, ways of exploiting the strengths of the MISR and MODIS data have been found, and in many cases, independent validation was performed specific to the application.…”
Section: Application Of Misr and Modis Aerosol Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thin layer of absorbing aerosol above clouds can trigger very high AI values especially for regions with optically thick clouds (Meyer et al, 2013;Yu et al, 2012;Alfaro-Contreras et al, 2014;Torres et al, 2012). Also, erroneously high MODIS AOD can be found over 20 cloud edges due to inaccurate cloud screening or cloud 3-D effects (Zhang et al, 2006;Shi et al, 2010). Utilization of the two parameters together provides better detection of the ideal granules for the study.…”
Section: An Aerosol Algorithm For Heavy Smokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By excluding these optically thick aerosol data, this misclassification can introduce a low bias in aerosol regional climatology and further influence other studies that rely on 15 satellite data. In particular the aerosol modeling and aerosol data assimilation efforts to model and predict the consequences of these events for air quality and visibility forecasts will be misled due to this low bias in the "observed" quantities (Zhang et al, 2006;Benedetti, et al, 2009;Chung et al, 2010). This was indeed the case during the Indonesian smoke event of 2015.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%