2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MODIS enhanced vegetation index predicts tree species richness across forested ecoregions in the contiguous U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
88
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various linear and non-linear relationships between satellite-derived SVIs and f PAR have been found for different vegetation types and climatic conditions (e.g., Asrar et al, 1984;Badhwar et al, 1986;Fassnacht and Gower, 1997) where NIR and Red is the reflectance in the near infrared and red, respectively (Tucker 1979). SVIs have also been used to follow seasonal dynamics of vegetation using temporal profile analysis (Badhwar and Henderson, 1981;Henderson and Badhwar, 1984), and, when seasonally integrated, have been shown to be correlated with aboveground net primary production (NPP, defined as the difference between GPP and plant respiration) on an annual basis (Goward and Dye, 1987;Waring et al, 2006).…”
Section: Empirical Determination Of Absorbed Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various linear and non-linear relationships between satellite-derived SVIs and f PAR have been found for different vegetation types and climatic conditions (e.g., Asrar et al, 1984;Badhwar et al, 1986;Fassnacht and Gower, 1997) where NIR and Red is the reflectance in the near infrared and red, respectively (Tucker 1979). SVIs have also been used to follow seasonal dynamics of vegetation using temporal profile analysis (Badhwar and Henderson, 1981;Henderson and Badhwar, 1984), and, when seasonally integrated, have been shown to be correlated with aboveground net primary production (NPP, defined as the difference between GPP and plant respiration) on an annual basis (Goward and Dye, 1987;Waring et al, 2006).…”
Section: Empirical Determination Of Absorbed Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches have been developed to interpret phenological events from temporal variations in vegetation indices or, in this situation, sequential digital imagery. Information on key dates, such as the start and end of the growing season are possible (Waring et al 2006). One key method to extract these dates is based on the seasonal-midpoint (or half-maximum) approach, which was designed to predict the initial leaf expansion of broadleaf forests (White et al 1999;Schwartz et al 2002).…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method first calculates the annual minimum and maximum value for each pixel and the midpoint is then calculated and added to the minimum. This calculated value has the advantage over other formulations in that it is sensitive to site-specific variations in the range of values and may be more sensitive to local variation in canopy leaf area and chlorophyll concentrations (Waring et al 2006). Once 2G-RBi values were calculated for each region of interest within the images for the duration of the observation period, curves were fitted to the data to estimate green-up and senescence.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, a number of studies have associated the biodiversity of different sites with the information obtained by passive remote sensors [23][24][25][26][27], correlating biological diversity directly with spectral reflectance values [28], with different spectral vegetation indexes [19,25,[29][30][31], and different types of feature extraction like principal components analysis (PCA) [32] or minimum noise fraction (MNF) [26]. Taking this into account, it is expected that hyperspectral sensors, which have great ability to detect characteristics associated with the biochemical, physiological, and structural spectral variability of the vegetation in the electromagnetic spectrum, will provide valuable information for the evaluation of biodiversity [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%