2006
DOI: 10.3133/sir20065009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MODOPTIM: A general optimization program for ground-water flow model calibration and ground-water management with MODFLOW

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water-level declines during the 2000-03 irrigation seasons were analyzed in Snake Valley because crops had been inventoried and drought conditions existed during this period. Hydraulic properties were estimated by minimizing a weighted sumof-squares objective function that compared simulated and measured drawdowns (Halford, 2006). Seasonal drawdowns from spatially distributed groundwater pumping were simulated with a three-dimensional, MODFLOW model.…”
Section: Hydraulic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water-level declines during the 2000-03 irrigation seasons were analyzed in Snake Valley because crops had been inventoried and drought conditions existed during this period. Hydraulic properties were estimated by minimizing a weighted sumof-squares objective function that compared simulated and measured drawdowns (Halford, 2006). Seasonal drawdowns from spatially distributed groundwater pumping were simulated with a three-dimensional, MODFLOW model.…”
Section: Hydraulic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walton (2007) recommends analysis of multi-well aquifer tests through simulation utilizing parameter estimation. Some of the tests conducted since the mid-1990s were analyzed with numerical models (Sepulveda, 2006;Yobbi and Halford, 2008;Gonthier, 2011) that utilize a modifi ed version of MODFLOW 1996 (Harbaugh and McDonald, 1996) called MODOPTIM (Halford, 2006).…”
Section: Types Of Tests and Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)-(3) use lithologic thicknesses to calculate composite hydraulic properties to simplify model layering. However, the use of regression-based PE techniques (Halford, 2006) requires using the radial axisymmetric 2D flow models similar to the ones used to analyze the aquifer-test data, but with simplified model layers and calibrated to the same aquifertest data. The models that simulated the combined flow in the SAS and ICU as one lithologic unit (quasi-2D flow model) were developed assuming an ICU layer with zero specific storage and zero horizontal hydraulic conductivity in Eqs.…”
Section: Composite Hydraulic Properties For Model Layer Simplificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first method presented in this chapter is to compute the thickness weighted average horizontal hydraulic conductivity and specific storage and the thickness weighted harmonic mean vertical hydraulic conductivity for a reduced number of layers in the unconfined aquifer and the leaky confining unit. The second method is to compute hydraulic properties by using the observed head from aquifer tests and applying the regression-based parameter estimation (PE) techniques (Poeter et al, 2005;Halford, 2006;Hill & Tiedeman, 2007). As the number of simulated layers in the unconfined aquifer is decreased, the performance of each model is assessed by analyzing changes in simulated heads under aquifer test conditions and by simulating flow exchanges between the hydrogeologic units under hypothetical but realistic recharge rates to the unconfined aquifer and withdrawals from the confined aquifer.…”
Section: Derivation Of Composite Hydraulic Properties For Simplified mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation