2005
DOI: 10.1007/b104035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular Algorithms in Symbolic Summation and Symbolic Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar algorithm for integer polynomials is given by the first author in [7], Section 7.2. The idea is related to that of Man & Wright [13], who describe an algorithm for dispersion based on polynomial factorization in [x].…”
Section: Computing the Dispersion Set Over [X]mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A similar algorithm for integer polynomials is given by the first author in [7], Section 7.2. The idea is related to that of Man & Wright [13], who describe an algorithm for dispersion based on polynomial factorization in [x].…”
Section: Computing the Dispersion Set Over [X]mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By Lemma 2, the kernel K is differential-reduced. Note that the DRCF of a rational function also appears in [7,Chap. 8].…”
Section: A Differential Canonical Formmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The more costly step is the Taylor shift by 1, that is, x → x + 1. Using asymptotically fast Taylor shift [14], we therefor need O(n(n + τ(f I ))) =Õ(n(n(L + h) + Σ( f ))) =Õ(n 2 (L − log σ ( f ))) bit operations at a node of level h = O(log n − log σ ( f )) because −n log σ ( f ) ≥ Σ( f ). For the cost of computing the polynomials at all nodes, we thus get the bound (|T apx | + |T ex |) ·Õ(n 2 (L − log σ ( f ))) =Õ(n 2 (L − log σ ( f ))(n + Σ( f ))) due to Theorem 21.…”
Section: Bit Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%