2018
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular and flexible spectral-element waveform modelling in two and three dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
149
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the forward and inverse problem are based on the spectral element solver Salvus (Afanasiev et al, ). We thus operate in the time domain, and we can account for 3‐D heterogeneous and attenuating media, as well as for topography and internal discontinuities.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the forward and inverse problem are based on the spectral element solver Salvus (Afanasiev et al, ). We thus operate in the time domain, and we can account for 3‐D heterogeneous and attenuating media, as well as for topography and internal discontinuities.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors acknowledge support from and discussions within TIDES COST ActionES1401. Numerical simulations were performed with Salvus (Afanasiev et al, ). S20RTS was downloaded from Submachine (Hosseini et al, ).…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instaseis is a very efficient tool for computing seismograms for any type of arbitrary source at the order of seconds. For 3D case, we choose to use Salvus (Afanasiev et al 2018).…”
Section: Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to industry, earthquake seismologists have focused exclusively on the (an)elastic case because shear waves and surface waves are integral parts of the earthquake-generated wavefield. Here, time-domain solvers based on the spectral-element method [100][101][102][103][104] are heavily favoured because of their ability to accommodate topography, bathymetry and fluid-solid boundaries, such as the core-mantle boundary (CMB), 1990s -2D FWI successfully applied (Pratt et al [34][35][36][37] 1977 -Development of adjoint-state method for inverse problems in exploration seismology ( Tarantola 62 ) 1987 -Waveform inversion in spherically symmetric background models using the surface wavefield T e c h n i c a l R e v i e w s thereby accurately capturing dispersive surface waves and diffracted waves.…”
Section: Adjoint Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational cost of adjoint-state calculations [60][61][62] is independent of the number of model parameters and the number of receivers, initially prompting the development of FWI in exploration seismology. Although that field uses both time-domain 128 and frequency-domain [129][130][131] implementations of these simulations, time-domain spectral-element solvers are preferred in earthquake seismology 100,104,132,133 . These solvers use an 'optimize-then-discretize' approach to the adjoint operator 134 .…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%