1989
DOI: 10.1109/41.20342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular TMR multiprocessor system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TMR is one of the most popular hardware fault-tolerance methods. Errors generated by any single faulty module are masked using a simple voter [6], [15]. The TMR is useful for tolerating a single permanent fault or ITF.…”
Section: Ctfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TMR is one of the most popular hardware fault-tolerance methods. Errors generated by any single faulty module are masked using a simple voter [6], [15]. The TMR is useful for tolerating a single permanent fault or ITF.…”
Section: Ctfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TMR is useful for tolerating a single permanent fault or ITF. Research on TMR systems is documented in many papers [6], [8]- [10], [15]. In [3], [4], [6], retry techniques using time redundancy are introduced in TMR to tolerate ITF more effectively.…”
Section: Ctfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [22], an optimal TMR structure to recover from a transient fault was shown to extend significantly the lifetime of a small system in spite of its requirement of reliable voter circuits. The authors of [3] propdsed a modular TMR multiprocessor to increase reliability and availability by using a retry mechanism to recover transient faults, and switching between TMR and dual-processor modes to isolate a permanent fault. A simple multiple-retry policy (retry a pre-specified number of times)-also' used to discriminate a permanent fault-was employed there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault tolerant systems have been studied for a long time, and many solutions have been proposed such as the insertion of codes for error correction [3] and the use of software [4] or hardware [5] redundancy. However, none of these solutions is able to cope with simultaneous faults and, when they are able to do so, the cost increase makes the solution impractical, or at least very expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%