2013
DOI: 10.15298/rusjtheriol.12.1.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modularity and integration in ontogeny of the middle facial skeleton in two West African monkey species: collared mangabey (Cercocebus torquatus) and olive colobus (Procolobus verus)

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Could studying of a single bones morphological variation and growth provide some additional information? For addressing this question a configuration of 13 landmarks from the middle part of the upper facial skeleton was digitized by Microscribe 3D digitizer on 25 skulls of Cercocebus torquatus and 16 skulls of Procolobus verus of different age and sex. Our results suggest that despite of strong ontogenetic integration in postnatal growth of the primate facial skeleton a study on a single bones growth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
(149 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, due to their limited functional role, the nasal bones could be less constrained in their growth and thus more variable. Similarly high variability in nasal bone shape is observed in many primate species (Evteev & Nanova, ; Schultz, ). It is unlikely that such increased variance is due to methodological issues since simotic dimensions exhibit a low level of intraobserver error (see Table ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Also, due to their limited functional role, the nasal bones could be less constrained in their growth and thus more variable. Similarly high variability in nasal bone shape is observed in many primate species (Evteev & Nanova, ; Schultz, ). It is unlikely that such increased variance is due to methodological issues since simotic dimensions exhibit a low level of intraobserver error (see Table ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%