I ntroductionIn the previous paper, 1 we critically discussed the main features of a scientific publication. We based this discussion on the report of an International Working Group. 2 We argued that this report is the near-final description of a scientific publication within the traditional document paradigm. The authors carefully touched on all the important intrinsic issues of a scientific communication and listed the requirements that electronic publications have to fulfil. In our discussion of this report, we extended the argument beyond print on paper, and this resulted in a series of concerns. It illustrated that the transformation of scientific information from paper to an electronic carrier is not a simple projection but implies a complete reconsideration of the way in which scholarly communications are produced and read.Below, the consequences of electronic preparation, handling, storage, retrieval, and reading are discussed, based on a model developed at the University of Amsterdam.
Towards an understanding of electronic publicationsAs indicated in the previous paper, we need to appreciate the differences between traditional paper documents and electronic documents, in order to arrive at a full understanding and new guidelines for electronic publishing. This means that we have to abstract from the current accepted daily practice of scientific communication in order, first, to define socially and scientifically acceptable rules of conduct, and subsequently to apply them within the context of a new environment.The abstract notions of the International Working Group are, of course, correct overall; the problem is in the implementation. This implementation demands a better grasp of the nature of electronic documents. For