2007
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.76.014602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulated Structure of the Composite Crystal [2CaOH]kCoO2(k=0.576)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that it is composed of the alternate stacking along c of 1 layer of CrO 2 and 2 layers of SrO, with consecutive CrO 2 layers related by a (001) mirror; this is responsible of the resulting orthorhombic symmetry. This type of orthorhombic stacking has been observed in sulphides [12] as well as in cobalt oxides and hydroxides [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that it is composed of the alternate stacking along c of 1 layer of CrO 2 and 2 layers of SrO, with consecutive CrO 2 layers related by a (001) mirror; this is responsible of the resulting orthorhombic symmetry. This type of orthorhombic stacking has been observed in sulphides [12] as well as in cobalt oxides and hydroxides [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This strong M(u ¼ 1)-O2(u ¼ 2) bond is also found in the Sr-Bi cobaltite, where it is enhanced by the weak BiO-BiO intrasubsystem interaction within the four atoms thick rock salt-type layer [3]. Apart from this oxide, in other cobaltites, despite being shorter when compared to sulphides, the shortest intrasubsystem distance alternates from shorter to longer than the intrasubsystem interaction along t [29,30,38,39]. However, in this Sr-Cr misfit oxide, both shortest distances become shorter for the same t Regarding the modulation in the distances of the RS-type layer of the Sr-Cr misfit, the largest difference between the maxima and minimum Sr-O1 distance for the same bond is that observed for O1 1 30,40].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present case of (Ca 0.85 OH) 1.16 CoO 2 , the thickness d modulates in the range of 1.91 ≤ d ≤ 2.04 Å, about 1.96 Å on average. The average d value, 1.96 Å, is shorter than that measured for non-doped orthorhombic (CaOH) 1.14 CoO 2 (Co 2.94+ , d ≈ 2.05 Å), , but is longer than the superconducting sodium cobalt oxides, such as Na 0.343 (H 3 O) 0.237 CoO 2 ·1.19H 2 O (BLH-Na x CoO 2 ( P 2): Co 3.43+ , d ≈ 1.80 Å) or Na 0.35 (H 3 O) 0.17 (H 2 O) 1.22 CoO 2 (BLH-Na x CoO 2 ( P 3): Co 3.48+ , d ≈ 1.85 Å) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Motivated by this hypothesis we searched for a new member to the layered cobalt oxide family. Recently, two new cobalt calcium hydroxides were synthesized for the first time using the solid-state reaction method at a high temperature and pressure. These two new materials are (CaOH) 1.14 CoO 2 , which exhibits an orthorhombic lattice structure, and (Ca 0.85 OH) 1.16 CoO 2 , which exhibits a monoclinic lattice structure, where the orthorhombic phase is a polytype of the monoclinic phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%