2021
DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulating the Radiation Response for Improved Outcomes in Breast Cancer

Abstract: Author affiliations and support information (if applicable) appear at the end of this article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
(189 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in this study we demonstrate that AR expression may be influencing the efficacy of ER inhibitors in modulating radiosensitisation in AR+/ER+ breast cancer cells, future studies are necessary to understand why ER-targeting therapies may be effective for the radiosensitisation in some preclinical ER+ breast cancer models but not others. This may be due to the expression of additional biomarkers that can impact radiosensitivity including HER2 and EGFR [ 49 52 ], PI3K/mTOR [ 53 , 54 ] and PARP [ 55 57 ], among others. While preclinical studies are useful to start interrogating these questions using models that have been studied extensively, translation of these findings into the clinic brings additional variabilities including, but not limited to, individual patient characteristics, adherence to treatment, as well as other concurrent therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in this study we demonstrate that AR expression may be influencing the efficacy of ER inhibitors in modulating radiosensitisation in AR+/ER+ breast cancer cells, future studies are necessary to understand why ER-targeting therapies may be effective for the radiosensitisation in some preclinical ER+ breast cancer models but not others. This may be due to the expression of additional biomarkers that can impact radiosensitivity including HER2 and EGFR [ 49 52 ], PI3K/mTOR [ 53 , 54 ] and PARP [ 55 57 ], among others. While preclinical studies are useful to start interrogating these questions using models that have been studied extensively, translation of these findings into the clinic brings additional variabilities including, but not limited to, individual patient characteristics, adherence to treatment, as well as other concurrent therapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review by Pesch et al [56] includes ongoing trials of concurrent radiation and radiation response modulators including PAPR inhibitors and immunotherapy that are not the subject of our manuscript. Recent phase II trials evaluating pre-operative dual modality chemo-radiation therapy for patients with TNBC are included in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical radiotherapy involves the delivery of fractionated doses of ionizing radiation to the affected cancerous breast tissue while sparing the surrounding benign tissues. This results in targeted disruption of tumor cells through induction of DNA damage, alterations in the cell cycle, and ultimately cancer cell death ( 138 140 ). Multiple randomized clinical trials have effectively established that radiotherapy reduces local recurrence in both invasive and noninvasive breast cancers, in addition to reducing the risk of breast cancer death ( 141 143 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery is the standard of care for breast cancer treatment, while numerous studies support the therapeutic potential of combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy for treating breast cancer patients. The evidence supporting the integration of radiotherapy with chemotherapy has been more extensively reviewed elsewhere ( 140 , 195 , 196 ). Importantly, many chemotherapies function by inducing DNA damage, consequently resulting in synergistic effects when combined with radiotherapy in the preclinical and clinical setting ( 140 , 197 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation