2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.02.324418
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of early host innate immune response by a Fowlpox virus (FWPV) lateral body protein

Abstract: The avian pathogen, fowlpox virus (FWPV) has been successfully used as vaccine vector in poultry and humans but relatively little is known about its ability to modulate host antiviral immune responses in these hosts, which are replication permissive and non-permissive, respectively. FWPV is highly resistant to avian type I interferon (IFN) and able to completely block the host IFN-response. Microarray screening of host IFN-regulated gene expression in cells infected with 59 different, non-essential FWPV gene k… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of IFN-I response in poxvirus infected cells is likely due to the presence of numerous virally-encoded suppressors of PRR signaling and IFN-I production ( 19 , 24 ), hence deletion of specific innate immunomodulators from the viral genome can result in a virus that stimulates host IFN-I signaling. We made use of FWPV mutants FPV012 and FPV184 ( 19 , 20 ), each deficient in single genes that are proposed immunomodulators, and both of which induce IFN-I production from infected cells ( 19 ), including HD11 cells ( Figure 6B ). In the absence of cGAS or STING the transcription of IFN-I, ISG12.2, BLB1 and CD40 by FPV184 or FPV012 was significantly lower at 24 h post infection ( Figures 6B, C ), despite robust infection of HD11 cells by all three virus strains ( Figure 6D ), indicating that FWPV is sensed in infected cells by the DNA sensing PRR cGAS and that the cGAS/STING pathway is responsible for FWPV-induced IFN-I production and MHC-II transcription.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of IFN-I response in poxvirus infected cells is likely due to the presence of numerous virally-encoded suppressors of PRR signaling and IFN-I production ( 19 , 24 ), hence deletion of specific innate immunomodulators from the viral genome can result in a virus that stimulates host IFN-I signaling. We made use of FWPV mutants FPV012 and FPV184 ( 19 , 20 ), each deficient in single genes that are proposed immunomodulators, and both of which induce IFN-I production from infected cells ( 19 ), including HD11 cells ( Figure 6B ). In the absence of cGAS or STING the transcription of IFN-I, ISG12.2, BLB1 and CD40 by FPV184 or FPV012 was significantly lower at 24 h post infection ( Figures 6B, C ), despite robust infection of HD11 cells by all three virus strains ( Figure 6D ), indicating that FWPV is sensed in infected cells by the DNA sensing PRR cGAS and that the cGAS/STING pathway is responsible for FWPV-induced IFN-I production and MHC-II transcription.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fowlpox WT (FP9) and mutants [FPV012 ( 19 ) and FPV184 ( 20 )] were propagated in primary chicken embryonic fibroblasts (CEFs) and grown in DMEM-F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 1% FBS and 5% P/S, and harvested 5 days later. Ten-fold dilutions of cell supernatants were prepared in serum-free DMEM-F12 and used to inoculate confluent monolayers of CEFs for 1.5 h at 37°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%