2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of electric brain responses evoked by pitch deviants through transcranial direct current stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, we successfully simulated the amusic profile using random feedback in typical brains as an experimental model for the conscious access deficit in amusia. The use of this transient experimental model can be compared, for instance, to the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to temporarily "induce" brain lesions 51 . Our successful modeling of the amusic phenotype using false feedback suggests a causal link between unreliable feedback, conscious access to tonal knowledge, and the amusic disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, we successfully simulated the amusic profile using random feedback in typical brains as an experimental model for the conscious access deficit in amusia. The use of this transient experimental model can be compared, for instance, to the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to temporarily "induce" brain lesions 51 . Our successful modeling of the amusic phenotype using false feedback suggests a causal link between unreliable feedback, conscious access to tonal knowledge, and the amusic disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results revealed that information about the type of deviance was processed in different regions within the prefrontal cortex. Later, in a study by Royal et al, real tDCS or sham stimulation were performed on the right frontal area and right temporal area of subjects in different pitch change detection tasks to study the abnormal pitch detection in these areas [ 46 ]. The experiment consisted of three sessions, one for each type of stimulation (frontal, temporal, or sham stimulation).…”
Section: Physiological Effects Of Tes On the Auditory Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the effects of three different types of tES on auditory behavior, and considering the physiological and neuromodulation characteristics of tDCS, the behavioral effects produced by tDCS may be related to the adjustment ability of task-related neural processing rather than the temporal and spatial specificity of the electric fields generated by the stimulation itself [ 120 ]. Therefore, the connection between tDCS and auditory behavior will be manifested by the changes in ERP amplitude induced by different auditory tasks [ 31 , 46 ]. However, due to the lower temporal resolution of tDCS, tACS was used in more cases to explore changes in behavior within a higher temporal resolution.…”
Section: Outline and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we investigated effects of these sudden changes on prefrontal cortex (PFC) brain activity and positive emotions, including excitement, taking advantage of a particularly tense and deviating dance music technique referred to as a Drop. Three brain areas are repeatedly shown to be involved in processing musical features during passive music listening, such as structure, rhythm, pitch, and melodies: the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the middle frontal gyrus (MFG) (Kunert, Willems, Casasanto, Patel, & Hagoort, 2015;Lappe, Steinsträter, & Pantev, 2013;Nan & Friederici, 2013;Royal, Zendel, Desjardins, Robitaille, & Peretz, 2018;Thaut, Trimarchi, & Davide, 2014). These areas are also associated with experiencing positive music emotions including; pleasantness, anticipation, empathy, and excitement, as well as physiological responses indicative of positive feelings, such as 'chills' (Greene, Flannery, & Soto, 2014;Koelsch, Fritz, Cramon, Müller, & Friederici, 2006;Lehne, Rohrmeier, & Koelsch, 2014;Tabatabaie et al, 2014;Wallmark, Deblieck, & Iacoboni, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%