1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1982.tb00173.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of Immune Response by Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide (LPS): Roles of Macrophages and T Cells in In Vitro Adjuvant Effect of LPS on Antibody Response to T Cell‐Dependent and T Cell‐Independent Antigens

Abstract: The roles of macrophages and T cells in the adjuvant effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were studied. In vitro anti-trinitrophenyl (anti-TNP) antibody responses to TNP-Ficoll and TNP-keyhole limpet hemocyanine (TNP-KLH) in spleen cells of C57BL/6 mice showed the most enhancement, when LPS was added to cultures at I fI.g/ml 48 hr after culture was started. The responses to these antigens were enhanced markedly by LPS in whole and macrophage-depleted spleen cells. The enhancement was greater in the latter group … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps this discrepancy would be based on the difference between titers of O-antigen-specific antibodies in our anti-porin serum and those of Saxen et al, because Saxen et al have used hyperimmune serum of rabbits. In addition, O-antigen-specific antibodies would protect such a low challenge dose as used by Saxen et al Therefore, a contamination of low amounts of LPS in porin might be necessary as an adjuvant to porin and enhance the immune response (27,31). However, it seemed unlikely that LPS was a protective antigen which could induce the CMI, because we found that neither DTH reaction nor IL-2 production were induced by the immunization with LPS alone in mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Perhaps this discrepancy would be based on the difference between titers of O-antigen-specific antibodies in our anti-porin serum and those of Saxen et al, because Saxen et al have used hyperimmune serum of rabbits. In addition, O-antigen-specific antibodies would protect such a low challenge dose as used by Saxen et al Therefore, a contamination of low amounts of LPS in porin might be necessary as an adjuvant to porin and enhance the immune response (27,31). However, it seemed unlikely that LPS was a protective antigen which could induce the CMI, because we found that neither DTH reaction nor IL-2 production were induced by the immunization with LPS alone in mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Whereas in the CASP model no published work to date has determined the state of the immune response beyond 24 h, different parameters associated with immunosuppression have been reported in other models. Old work reports that the injection of moderate doses of LPS daily reduces the capacity to generate antibodies for between 1 and 7 days (42,43), and using the CLP model, a low clearance capacity and an increased sensitivity to a second infection were observed (40,50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other microbial compounds /products such as b-glucan and dsRNA, LPS possesses certain conserved structural sequences that have profound effects on the immune system of many animals. It can either enhance or suppress the immunity by affecting T cells, B cells, macrophages, and other immune components in different animal species [94,95].…”
Section: Effects Of Endotoxin On Fish Immunitymentioning
confidence: 99%