1999
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.17.12157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Binding to the Recombinant Ligand-binding Site of the Type-1 Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor by Ca2+ and Calmodulin

Abstract: (14,15).The N-terminal part of the IP 3 R contains all the structural determinants responsible for specific and selective binding of its physiological agonist, IP 3 (17-20). We have therefore expressed the N-terminal ligand-binding site (first 581 amino acids) of the mouse IP 3 R-1 in Escherichia coli, using a strategy of growth and expression at low temperatures, as described previously by Yoshikawa et al. (20). This protein contains a previously identified Ca 2ϩ -binding region located between amino acids 30… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
63
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(40 reference statements)
9
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that one of these sites is responsible for modulation of ligand binding and that the affinity of this site for Ca 2ϩ is different in the alternatively spliced isoforms. An alternative possibility is raised by the recent finding that the addition of CaM inhibits [ 3 H]IP 3 binding to full-length type-I IP 3 Rs (33,34) and to the ligand binding domain expressed as a fusion protein (35). The affinity for Ca 2ϩ /CaM at an interaction site in the ligand binding domain of the receptor could be different in the two alternatively spliced isoforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that one of these sites is responsible for modulation of ligand binding and that the affinity of this site for Ca 2ϩ is different in the alternatively spliced isoforms. An alternative possibility is raised by the recent finding that the addition of CaM inhibits [ 3 H]IP 3 binding to full-length type-I IP 3 Rs (33,34) and to the ligand binding domain expressed as a fusion protein (35). The affinity for Ca 2ϩ /CaM at an interaction site in the ligand binding domain of the receptor could be different in the two alternatively spliced isoforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The affinity for Ca 2ϩ /CaM at an interaction site in the ligand binding domain of the receptor could be different in the two alternatively spliced isoforms. It should be noted that the effect of CaM on ligand binding occurs in the absence of added Ca 2ϩ (33)(34)(35) (27) or biphasic (28) effects of Ca 2ϩ on ligand binding reported in studies using the Sf9 expression system. The reasons for these differences are unclear but may be due to differences in the ancillary regulatory proteins present in the COS and insect cell expression systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 H]IP 3 binding disappeared at alkaline pH, probably due to a conformational change of calmodulin (9,11). The apparent discrepancy between the functional data reported in the present study and the [ 3 H]IP 3 binding data (9 -11) may be due to the existence of multiple calmodulin-binding or Ca 2ϩ -binding sites that play a role and/or to the fact that IP 3 binding, which is only one step, albeit a crucial step, for channel opening, is not equivalent to the channel activity itself.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calmodulin, a Ca 2ϩ -binding protein abundantly present in many cell types (6), binds to the modulatory region of the IP 3 R in a Ca 2ϩ -dependent way (7,8). Calmodulin also interacts with the IP 3 R in a Ca 2ϩ -independent way (9 -11), with one of the interaction sites located within the IP 3 -binding domain (11 (14). The association constants for BAPTA were: H-BAPTA, 6.36; H-HBAPTA, 5.47; Ca-BAPTA, 6.97; and Sr-BAPTA, 5.13 (15).…”
Section: From the Laboratorium Voor Fysiologie Katholieke Universitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…in peripheral tissues) and is antagonized by cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of IP 3 R-1 (11). The consequences of CaM binding to IP 3 R-1 are inhibitory; apo-CaM inhibits IP 3 binding to its receptor (8,12), whereas the binding of Ca 2ϩ /CaM inhibits Ca 2ϩ release through the channel (13,14). The relation, however, between the nature of the CaMbinding sites and the functional effects of CaM remains to be established.…”
Section: Camentioning
confidence: 99%