2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of mechanical and surface hydrophobic properties of food protein films by transglutaminase treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of 2% xylose increases surface hydrophobicity by about 2.5 times comparatively to H 0 for the sample without xylose, and the addition of 5% xylose increases this value by 2.7 times. Almost similar trend in surface hydrophobicity was reported in soy protein lm crosslinking with transglutaminase 18 and glucomannan. 9 The observed increase may be attributed to the partial unfolding of protein molecules during the xylose-modied PPI preparation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The addition of 2% xylose increases surface hydrophobicity by about 2.5 times comparatively to H 0 for the sample without xylose, and the addition of 5% xylose increases this value by 2.7 times. Almost similar trend in surface hydrophobicity was reported in soy protein lm crosslinking with transglutaminase 18 and glucomannan. 9 The observed increase may be attributed to the partial unfolding of protein molecules during the xylose-modied PPI preparation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…15 Generally, protein lms with higher surface hydrophobicity have a better potential to overcome the problem of lm solubility and hygroscopy. 18 The index of H 0 for PPI-X power was determined by the uorescence emission spectra of ANS. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the improvement in the contact angle after sonication could be attributed to the domination of surface functionality of the nanoparticles compared to the pure WPI film. Generally, protein films with higher contact angles exhibit a higher surface hydrophobicity (Tang and Jiang, 2007). The contact angles decreased with an increase in measurement time from 60 s to 300 s irrespective of sonication level and nanoparticle loading (Fig.…”
Section: Surface Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Surface hydrophobicity of whey protein concentrate films could also be significantly increased by treatment with microbial transglutaminase, suggesting that moderate cross-linking can result in exposure of hydrophobic groups within the protein structure [157].…”
Section: Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanchez and others studied the effect of different plasticizers (five polyols of the ethylene glycol series and glycerol) on the surface properties of wheat gliadin films, showing high hydrophobicity but no influence of the plasticizers used [157,196] significantly increased (p < 0.01) the contact angle values and therewith surface hydrophilicity of wheat gluten films by microbial transglutaminase treatment.…”
Section: Surface Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%