Modulation of recognition and temporal order memory retrieval by dopamine D1 receptor in rats

Hotte, Maïté; Naudon, Laurent; Jay, Thérèse M.

doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2005.04.002

Cited by 76 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mice failed to discriminate between the objects in the familiar and novel location 24 h later, precluding the assessment of SD effects. This incapacity is consistent with data showing that C57BL/6 mice and several rat strains (DA, Sprague-Dawley and Lister) tested in the object location task successfully discriminated between the familiar and novel object location after a delay interval of up to 6 h, while others (DBA/2 mice and Wistar rats) did not (Dix & Aggleton, 1999;Ennaceur, Michalikova, Bradford, & Ahmed, 2005;Hotte, Naudon, & Jay, 2005;Lee, Hunsaker, & Kesner, 2005;Roullet, Mele, & Ammassari-Teule, 1997). This failure in discrimination between the familiar and novel location of the objects can be related to either impaired memory for the object per se or inability to use spatial information after the relatively long delay of 24 h.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Sleep deprivation impairs object recognition in mice

Palchykova

Winsky‐Sommerer

Meerlo

et al. 2006

Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

163

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Sleep deprivation impairs object recognition in mice

Palchykova

Winsky‐Sommerer

Meerlo

et al. 2006

Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

163

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The D1 receptor antagonist SCH impaired 24-h retention in rats that were well habituated before the training, corroborating other reports showing that D1 receptors are important for the consolidation of PFC-dependent tasks (Hotte et al 2005;Izquierdo et al 2007;Nagai et al 2007). However, D1 blockade enhanced 24-h retention in rats that were not previously habituated to the experimental context.…”

supporting

confidence: 89%

Differential involvement of dopamine D1 receptor and MEK signaling pathway in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in consolidation and reconsolidation of recognition memory

Maroun¹,

Akirav²

2009

Learn. Mem.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigated MEK and D1 receptors in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in consolidation and reconsolidation of recognition memory in rats nonhabituated to the experimental context (NH) or with reduced arousal due to extensive prior habituation (H). The D1 receptor antagonist enhanced consolidation and impaired reconsolidation in NH but impaired consolidation with no effect on reconsolidation in H. The D1 receptor agonist had no effect on consolidation in either H or NH but impaired reconsolidation in both groups. The MEK inhibitor impaired consolidation and reconsolidation, regardless of arousal. Thus, vmPFC D1 receptors and MEK show differential involvement in memory and arousal.Evidence indicates that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays an important role in long-term recognition memory processes (Meunier et al. 1997;Ragozzino et al. 2002). Indeed, we have recently shown that both protein synthesis and NMDA receptors are required for consolidation and reconsolidation of recognition memory in the ventromedial PFC (vmPFC) (Akirav and Maroun 2006). Dopamine D1 receptors play an important role in prefrontal function, such as working memory, and there is evidence that dopamine D1 receptor activity can modulate plasticity (Gurden et al. 2000;Chen et al. 2007;Nagai et al. 2007;Rinaldi et al. 2007;Vijayraghavan et al. 2007). It has been suggested that the dopamine D1 receptor extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) signaling pathway in the PFC is critically involved in molecular adaptations that are necessary for long-term behavioral and neuronal plasticity (Nagai et al. 2007). The phosphorylation of ERK has been shown to be a correlate for plasticity (for review, see Sweatt 2004) and long-term memory for taste (Berman et al. 1998), fear conditioning (Schafe et al. 2000, and spatial tasks (Blum et al. 1999;Hebert and Dash 2002). Nagai et al. (2007) have found that dopamine D1 receptors regulate protein synthesis-dependent long-term recognition memory via ERK in the PFC.Exposure to stress is known to precipitate many neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia (Mazure 1995). These disorders involve memory deficits caused by PFC dysfunction (Mattes 1980;Weinberger et al. 1986;Deutch 1993;Fibiger 1995). Experimental evidence has shown that acute mild stressful stimuli such as exposure to novelty increases dopamine (DA) and dopamine metabolism in the PFC, producing working memory impairment that can be blocked by agents that prevent the increase in DA turnover (Murphy et al. 1996;Enrico et al. 1998;Takahata and Moghaddam 1998;Ihalainen et al. 1999;Feenstra et al. 2000;Del Arco and Mora 2001).We have recently shown that novelty or familiarity with the experimental arena, which differentially affects the arousal level of the rat, also has a differential effect on consolidation and reconsolidation of object recognition memory. Specifically, learning was tested under two arousal conditions: no previous habituation to the experimental context (high novelty stress/arousal level) or extensive...

show abstract

“…The difference of performance depending on the number of study phase items may be interpreted as a difference of familiarity between items presented at first and at last, namely two items presented in the test phase. Some previous studies used spontaneous object exploration as a test of temporal order memory (Hannesson et al 2004a;Hotte et al 2005;Barker et al 2007;Barker and Warburton 2011a,b). This consisted of two sample trials in which two identical objects were presented respectively, followed by one test trial in which two different objects, one from the first and the other from the second sample trials, were presented, and in this test subjects explored the first object more than the second object.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of number of items and interval length on the acquisition of temporal order discrimination in radial maze in rats

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Temporal order discrimination in rats was analyzed using a radial maze. The task consisted of a study phase in which two to five items (arms) were presented sequentially and, after a delay, a test phase in which two of these were simultaneously presented and the rat had to choose the arm presented earlier in the study phase. Acquisition of the task was better as the number of items in the study phase increased when the total study phase length was constant (4 min). Interval length between items in the study phase did not affect the acquisition regardless of the number of items. Additionally, discrimination performance was better when two items with more intervening items in the study phase (temporal lag) were used for the test. However, this tendency was obtained only when the last item of the study phase was included in the test pair. Results suggest that the number of items presented in the sequence, but not interval length between items, is an important factor in temporal order memory, and that a larger number of intervening items, as well as containing the last item in the study phase, contributes to the occurrence of the temporal lag effect.Temporal order memory is defined as memory for the order of experienced events, and can be demonstrated by the ability to recall the sequence of past experienced events or to discriminate which event occurred more previously (or recently) than another event (Hannesson et al. 2004a,b). It has been suggested that animals can remember the order of experienced events. Using a radial maze, Chiba et al. (1994) showed that rats can remember the temporal order of eight spatial locations previously visited. They also showed a temporal lag effect in rats. Temporal lag is defined as the number of intervening items, not number of intervening delays, in the study phase between two items that will be presented in the test phase. A phenomenon that performance is better when subjects discriminate temporally distant items (larger lag) compared with temporally adjacent items (smaller lag) is termed a temporal lag effect. In rodents studies, temporal lag effect has been observed in temporal order memory of spatial locations

show abstract

Modulation of recognition and temporal order memory retrieval by dopamine D1 receptor in rats

Cited by 76 publications

References 43 publications

Sleep deprivation impairs object recognition in mice

Sleep deprivation impairs object recognition in mice

Differential involvement of dopamine D1 receptor and MEK signaling pathway in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in consolidation and reconsolidation of recognition memory

Effects of number of items and interval length on the acquisition of temporal order discrimination in radial maze in rats

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About