2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation on brain gray matter activity and white matter integrity by APOE ε4 risk gene in cognitively intact elderly: A multimodal neuroimaging study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AD non-carriers: ↓ FA in left medial temporal areas, parahippocampal cingulum, bilateral intracalcarine sulcus, precuneus, lingual area • Healthy carriers vs. healthy non-carriers: ↓ FA bilateral medial temporal areas, scattered regions in frontal & parietal lobes & cerebellum Bendlin et al, 2010 136 (56; 80) 69.2 (10.2) VBA 3 0 2 × 2 × 3 12 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant differences Brown et al, 2011 55 (25; 30) 62.3 (9.0) Structural connectivity 3 800 or 1000 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 30 1 Global & regional connectivity • Carriers vs. non-carriers: age-related loss of mean local interconnectivity, & regional local interconnectivity decreases in the precuneus, medial orbitofrontal cortex, & lateral parietal cortex. Cai et al, 2017 309 (116; 193) 73.9 (4.6) VBA 3 Not reported 1.02 × 1.02 × 1.02 Not reported 1 Superior corona radiata, genu of corpus callosum • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↑ MD in superior corona radiata, genu of corpus callosum. No significant associations with FA or RD Cavedo et al, 2017 74 (31; 43) across 4 centres 68.9 (6.9) TBSS, VBA 1.5 or 3 0, 1000 or 0, 800 2 × 2 × 2 or 1 × 1 × 2.4 12, 15, 20 or 60 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA globally, and in genu, body & splenium of corpus callosum, internal capsule, external capsule, inferior fronto-occipital & inferior longitudinal fasciculi, cingulum (left & right).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD non-carriers: ↓ FA in left medial temporal areas, parahippocampal cingulum, bilateral intracalcarine sulcus, precuneus, lingual area • Healthy carriers vs. healthy non-carriers: ↓ FA bilateral medial temporal areas, scattered regions in frontal & parietal lobes & cerebellum Bendlin et al, 2010 136 (56; 80) 69.2 (10.2) VBA 3 0 2 × 2 × 3 12 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: no significant differences Brown et al, 2011 55 (25; 30) 62.3 (9.0) Structural connectivity 3 800 or 1000 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 30 1 Global & regional connectivity • Carriers vs. non-carriers: age-related loss of mean local interconnectivity, & regional local interconnectivity decreases in the precuneus, medial orbitofrontal cortex, & lateral parietal cortex. Cai et al, 2017 309 (116; 193) 73.9 (4.6) VBA 3 Not reported 1.02 × 1.02 × 1.02 Not reported 1 Superior corona radiata, genu of corpus callosum • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↑ MD in superior corona radiata, genu of corpus callosum. No significant associations with FA or RD Cavedo et al, 2017 74 (31; 43) across 4 centres 68.9 (6.9) TBSS, VBA 1.5 or 3 0, 1000 or 0, 800 2 × 2 × 2 or 1 × 1 × 2.4 12, 15, 20 or 60 1 Whole brain • Carriers vs. non-carriers: ↓ FA globally, and in genu, body & splenium of corpus callosum, internal capsule, external capsule, inferior fronto-occipital & inferior longitudinal fasciculi, cingulum (left & right).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is dedicated to investigating the distinct connectivity within the DMN that could represent the progressive biomarker. However, the results of resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) ( Teipel et al, 2015 ) and APOE studies have reported mixed results ( Cai et al, 2017 ; Luo et al, 2017 ; Caldwell et al, 2019 ; Zhu et al, 2019 ). Some reported decreased functional connectivity ( Yan et al, 2015 ) in APOE e4 allele carriers (APOE4+) compared with non-carries (APOE4-), the others found some increased functional connectivity ( Song et al, 2015 ; Zhu et al, 2018 ), while others didn’t found any differences ( Chiesa et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A working solution (4.4 µmol/l) of Fluo-3/acetoxymethyl ester dry powder (DingGuo Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) in anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide was prepared, according to the method described in a previous study ( 16 ). Briefly, at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after introducing the scratches, astrocytes in the dishes were rinsed with Hank's solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), treated with ~1 ml Fluo-3 working solution and placed in an incubator at 37°C, ensuring that the cells were protected from light, in order to load the cells with fluorescent probe for 45 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%