2005
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.080184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulatory effects of low‐ and high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual cortex of healthy subjects undergoing light deprivation

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to explore further the effects of light deprivation (LD) on visual cortex excitability. Healthy subjects reporting reliable induction of phosphenes by occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) underwent 60 min of complete LD. Phosphene threshold (PT) was measured before (T 0 ), after 45 min (T 1 ) and 60 min (T 2 ) of LD, and then every 10 min after light re-exposure until recovery to T 0 values. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) (at 1 or 10 Hz) was applied in separate sessions dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
59
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
59
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the excitatory levels found after high-frequency stimulation might be underestimated, whereas notch strength before TMS might be overestimated. Future studies may provide further mechanistic insights through systematic variation in TMS intensity (35,67,68) or by testing the dependence of the TMS effect on cortical states (22,39,49,69). However, our results suggest reduced inhibitory drive as one major origin of rTMSinduced increased excitability of the visual cortex.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the excitatory levels found after high-frequency stimulation might be underestimated, whereas notch strength before TMS might be overestimated. Future studies may provide further mechanistic insights through systematic variation in TMS intensity (35,67,68) or by testing the dependence of the TMS effect on cortical states (22,39,49,69). However, our results suggest reduced inhibitory drive as one major origin of rTMSinduced increased excitability of the visual cortex.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…In cat V1, 1 Hz rTMS was shown to reduce visually evoked potentials whereas 10 Hz rTMS led to increased amplitudes (35). Likewise in human visual cortex, 1 Hz vs. 10 Hz TMS regimes showed opposing effects on excitability, as measured by changes of phosphene thresholds (38,39). In particular, effectiveness of 10 Hz rTMS over human V1 was demonstrated by improved contrast sensitivity of amblyopic patients (40), as well as by modulation of performance in visual detection and feature discrimination tasks (41).…”
Section: Effects On Visual Cortical Processing-long-term Potentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, after 45 min of complete visual deprivation (blindfolded), normally sighted subjects show a significant decrease in PT (that is, an increase in cortical excitability), as well as complete recovery to baseline levels after re-exposure to light (Boroojerdi et al, 2000;Fierro et al, 2005). Therefore, it is possible that the ability of our subjects to perceive phosphenes would result from an enhancement in overall visual cortex excitability over time as a consequence of visual deprivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By applying TMS pulses at a frequency of 1 Hz it is possible to induce a temporary reduction of excitability in the stimulated region of cortex as measured by the relative strength of TMS stimulation required to elicit a certain cortical response pre-and post-rTMS stimulation [Fitzgerald et al, 2006]. This effect has been demonstrated specifically in visual cortex [Brighina et al, 2002;Fierro et al, 2005]. Offline 1 Hz rTMS has also been used to demonstrate that striate cortex is involved in the dichoptic (separate stimuli to each eye) combination of two components into a plaid percept [Saint-Amour et al, 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%