1981
DOI: 10.14492/hokmj/1381758078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Module correspondence in finite groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the Klilshammer-Puig generalisation [13, 1.20.3] of Dade's theorem [6,10] perhaps suggest the possibility of extending the machinery in this paper to reduce, to the almost simple cases, local assertions relating to Alperin [19], but [19,4.1] is actually the special case of Corollary 1.3(a) where P is a defect group of a. Corollary 13(a) is Okuyama [18,Theorem 5] (reference specifications indicate this undated typescript to have been written in 1980 or 1981). The last line of Okuyama's argument elides over the need to check that Dade's equivalence [6,10] can be chosen compatibly with the Brauer correspondence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…with the Klilshammer-Puig generalisation [13, 1.20.3] of Dade's theorem [6,10] perhaps suggest the possibility of extending the machinery in this paper to reduce, to the almost simple cases, local assertions relating to Alperin [19], but [19,4.1] is actually the special case of Corollary 1.3(a) where P is a defect group of a. Corollary 13(a) is Okuyama [18,Theorem 5] (reference specifications indicate this undated typescript to have been written in 1980 or 1981). The last line of Okuyama's argument elides over the need to check that Dade's equivalence [6,10] can be chosen compatibly with the Brauer correspondence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…First we note [12] Monomial representations and generalizations 275 PROOF. Let &~ be the class of all finite groups whose composition factors all have abelian Sylow p-subgroups.…”
Section: Let G Be a Finite Group ^ A Class Qf Finite Groups Closed Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T.Okuyanta [12] proved that if G is an M-group and P is Sylow P-subgroup of G, then ()/ G NPP is an M-group. I.M.Issacs [7] shows that if H is a Hall subgroup of an M-group then ()/ G NHH ′ is also and M-group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%