2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOF based MMMs with enhanced selectivity due to hindered linker distortion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…38 In the present work, GO/PI MMMs is developed for seawater desalination by the incorporation of GO into PI matrix polymer through a phase inversion method (Fig. 1).…”
Section: -32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 In the present work, GO/PI MMMs is developed for seawater desalination by the incorporation of GO into PI matrix polymer through a phase inversion method (Fig. 1).…”
Section: -32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that the polymer chains near to the surface of the filler particle become more structured. Since for the studied MMMs (ZIF-8/ Matrimid and ZIF-90/Matrimid) the glass transition temperature T g did increase by only a few degrees if the ZIF nanoparticles were incorporated into Matrimid [7], the effect of polymer rigidification takes place, but this alone cannot explain the experimental finding of a membrane selectivity which is much higher than the predicted one as shown in Fig. 5a shows that the Matrimid chains form an onion-like shell structure around an embedded nanoparticle.…”
Section: Polymer Rigidification Around the Nanofillermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two concepts for the possible influence of the polymer on mass transport through the MOF-polymer boundary are recently discussed in the literature: (1) The entry of the permeating molecules into the MOF is hindered as a result of hindered linker distortion by the surrounding polymer, which is a surface effect [7], and (2) the surrounding polymer reduces the framework flexibility of the embedded MOF, which is a bulk effect [21]. Two concepts for the possible influence of the polymer on mass transport through the MOF-polymer boundary are recently discussed in the literature: (1) The entry of the permeating molecules into the MOF is hindered as a result of hindered linker distortion by the surrounding polymer, which is a surface effect [7], and (2) the surrounding polymer reduces the framework flexibility of the embedded MOF, which is a bulk effect [21].…”
Section: Pore Size Narrowing Of the Mof In Contact With Polymermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the substrates usually need to be pretreated to introduce nucleation sites for MOF crystals, which can be rather critical and complicated. Another drawback of the traditional solvothermal way is that most of MOF membranes are synthesized in organic solvents, such as N , N ‐dimethylformamide, methanol, toluene, and so forth, which only provide the liquid environment for MOF membrane growth and cannot be recycled thereafter. Grande et al demonstrated that the impact of using solvents in the MOF synthesis is considerable via life‐cycle assessment, and utilization of solvents should be avoided if possible or reutilization strategies should be envisaged if is not possible to eliminate them .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%