MOF catalysis in relation to their homogeneous counterparts and conventional solid catalysts

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks have recently attracted attention as heterogeneous catalysts due to their high content of metal centres and large surface area and pore volume, along with their impressive topological richness. Therefore, many studies describing the use of MOFs as heterogeneous Lewis acid catalysts have been published. In this regard, these efforts have been directed towards probing the catalytic activity. Further information is required in terms of kinetic parameters and comparison of performance with their homogeneous counterparts, or other conventional heterogeneous catalysts. Here we have attempted to put MOFs into perspective with respect to their homogeneous counterparts and more conventional heterogeneous catalysts to show their advantages and limitations. We have exemplified a number of reactions reported in the literature wherein MOFs have been used as catalysts, and we have carried them out using homogeneous counterparts, i.e. benzoates and acetates, and other well defined conventional solid catalysts. The activities and selectivities of the catalysts are compared and then put into perspective on the basis of kinetic parameters, such as turnover numbers and turnover frequencies.Additionally, we illustrate using selected examples what the potential advantages of MOF catalysts could be, and how they may outperform the potential of other solid catalysts.

Stability of UiO-66 under acidic treatment: Opportunities and limitations for post-synthetic modifications

“…The possible future applications of these materials, ranging from separation [2][3][4]to storage [5,6], catalysis [7][8][9], drug delivery [10], luminescence [11], etc. attracted researchers from a considerably wide scientific field.…”

Conversion of levulinic acid into chemicals: Synthesis of biomass derived levulinate esters over Zr-containing MOFs

“…In recent years, Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) have attracted much interest due to their potential as heterogeneous catalysts (Corma et al, 2010a;Farrusseng et al, 2009;Garcia-Garcia et al, 2014;Gascon et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2009;Llabrés i Xamena and Gascon, 2013). MOFs are crystalline porous solids formed by the linkage of metal ions or metal-oxo clusters and polydentate organic linkers, forming three dimensional networks defining regular nanometric pore channels and cavities similar to those found in zeolites.…”

Insight into the catalytic properties and applications of metal–organic frameworks in the cyanosilylation of aldehydes

“…As indicated in Table 4, both aliphatic (Table 4, entry 1-3) and aromatic aldehydes (Table 4, entry 4-16) are well tolerated with this reaction protocol and could be converted to the corresponding O-trimethylsilyl cyanohydrin in good yields. Benzaldehydes bearing electrondonating groups (Table 4, entry [11][12] react much more slowly than benzaldehydes with electron-withdrawing groups. Benzaldehydes bearing electrondonating groups (Table 4, entry [11][12] react much more slowly than benzaldehydes with electron-withdrawing groups.…”