2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOF-derived porous Fe2O3 nanocubes combined with reduced graphene oxide for n-butanol room temperature gas sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The requirements for the reaction vessels are high, the safety is poor, and the reaction cannot be visually observed [210][211][212][213][214][215][216] Interfacial interaction Reduces stacking and aggregation, maintains a high specific surface area There are many factors affecting the reaction, and the wettability, compatibility, diffusivity, and the surface structure of the materials on both sides of the interface will also affect the interfacial effect [217][218][219] preparation methods of GO/MOF composites, and their advantages and disadvantages. There are various methods for the preparation of GO/ MOF composites, and we have tried to list the commonly used preparation methods in the last five years in Table 3 and summarize their respective advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Preparation Methods Advantages Disadvantages Refsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements for the reaction vessels are high, the safety is poor, and the reaction cannot be visually observed [210][211][212][213][214][215][216] Interfacial interaction Reduces stacking and aggregation, maintains a high specific surface area There are many factors affecting the reaction, and the wettability, compatibility, diffusivity, and the surface structure of the materials on both sides of the interface will also affect the interfacial effect [217][218][219] preparation methods of GO/MOF composites, and their advantages and disadvantages. There are various methods for the preparation of GO/ MOF composites, and we have tried to list the commonly used preparation methods in the last five years in Table 3 and summarize their respective advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Preparation Methods Advantages Disadvantages Refsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 The performance of gas sensors is largely dependent on the material used to detect the gas. Various MOS materials have been utilized to detect toxic gases, including Fe 2 O 3, 12 NiO, 13 Cr 2 O 3 , 14 ZnO, 15 Co 3 O 4 , 16 SnO 2 , 17 and WO 3 . 18 In particular, Fe 2 O 3 nanomaterials are widely used in the detection of combustible gases, toxic pollutant gases, and VOCs due to their high stability, low cost, high electrical conductivity, and environmental friendliness.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, a variety of methods have been developed for the detection of DEA gas. Metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS)-based resistive gas sensors have become the most commonly employed solid-state gas sensors due to their low cost, high sensitivity, and simple device structure. , The performance of gas sensors is largely dependent on the material used to detect the gas. Various MOS materials have been utilized to detect toxic gases, including Fe 2 O 3, NiO, Cr 2 O 3 , ZnO, Co 3 O 4 , SnO 2 , and WO 3 . In particular, Fe 2 O 3 nanomaterials are widely used in the detection of combustible gases, toxic pollutant gases, and VOCs due to their high stability, low cost, high electrical conductivity, and environmental friendliness. , For example, Hai et al developed 3D ultraporous Fe 2 O 3 nanostructures for ethanol and acetone detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only the morphology and sensing response but also the selectivity of the NiFe 2 O 4 materials can be varied by designing synthetic strategies. Due to their controllable pore size and easily modifiable surface, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are used as sacrificial templates to prepare metal oxide gas sensing materials to obtain gas sensors with superior performance. Furthermore, hollow MOF derivatives can provide more surface active sites and larger specific surface areas for the improved performance of gas sensing. For instance, Zhang et al obtained a porous NiFe 2 O 4 nano-octahedron with a hollow interior from Ni/Fe bimetallic MOFs, which has good gas sensitivity to toluene at low concentrations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%