2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOF-derived yolk-shell Co@ZnO/Ni@NC nanocage: Structure control and electromagnetic wave absorption performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[91] Because the chemical structures of these MAMs are identical, their EMW absorption properties can assist in clarifying the dependence of EMW absorption on topography. For example, Chen et al used two supramolecular MOF isomers (MIL-101-Fe and MIL-88B-Fe) as precursors for preparing Fe/C-based EMW absorption ZnOC@CoC@PAN ZIF-8@ZIF-67 Core-shell −50.62 5.86 [95] ZnO/NPC@Co/NPC ZIF-8@ZIF-67 −28.80 4.20 [96] Co/MnO/CNTs ZIF-8@ZIF-67 −58.00 4.50 [97] ZnO@C/Co 3 ZnC ZIF-8@ZIF-67 −62.90 5.50 [98] Co@C@NPC ZIF-8@ZIF-67 −57.20 5.70 [99] CoNi/TiO 2 MIL-125@ZIF-67 −65.3 4.40 [100] CoFe@C ZIF-67@PBA −44.10 5.20 [101] Co@ZnO/Ni@NC ZIF-67@ZIF-8 Yolk-shell −55.00 ≈3.60 [102] Co@NC ZIF-8@ZIF-67 Hollow multishell −52.50 4.40 [47] Cu/NC@Co/NC Cu-HKUST@ZIF-67 Core-satellite −54.13 5.19 [103] CoFe/FeZr 2 /CoZr 2 /ZrO 2 DUT-52@MIL-88B −65.2 4.80 [104] FeCoZn@C MIL-88B@MOF-5 −53.10 6.00 [105] composites (Figure 5d). [88] Additionally, different polar solvents have been used for MOF self-assembly to create supramolecular isomers (Figure 5c).…”
Section: Supramolecular Isomersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[91] Because the chemical structures of these MAMs are identical, their EMW absorption properties can assist in clarifying the dependence of EMW absorption on topography. For example, Chen et al used two supramolecular MOF isomers (MIL-101-Fe and MIL-88B-Fe) as precursors for preparing Fe/C-based EMW absorption ZnOC@CoC@PAN ZIF-8@ZIF-67 Core-shell −50.62 5.86 [95] ZnO/NPC@Co/NPC ZIF-8@ZIF-67 −28.80 4.20 [96] Co/MnO/CNTs ZIF-8@ZIF-67 −58.00 4.50 [97] ZnO@C/Co 3 ZnC ZIF-8@ZIF-67 −62.90 5.50 [98] Co@C@NPC ZIF-8@ZIF-67 −57.20 5.70 [99] CoNi/TiO 2 MIL-125@ZIF-67 −65.3 4.40 [100] CoFe@C ZIF-67@PBA −44.10 5.20 [101] Co@ZnO/Ni@NC ZIF-67@ZIF-8 Yolk-shell −55.00 ≈3.60 [102] Co@NC ZIF-8@ZIF-67 Hollow multishell −52.50 4.40 [47] Cu/NC@Co/NC Cu-HKUST@ZIF-67 Core-satellite −54.13 5.19 [103] CoFe/FeZr 2 /CoZr 2 /ZrO 2 DUT-52@MIL-88B −65.2 4.80 [104] FeCoZn@C MIL-88B@MOF-5 −53.10 6.00 [105] composites (Figure 5d). [88] Additionally, different polar solvents have been used for MOF self-assembly to create supramolecular isomers (Figure 5c).…”
Section: Supramolecular Isomersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known, dielectric loss type and magnetic loss type are the two most common wave-absorbing materials . Carbon materials are the most common dielectric loss materials, including graphene, , carbon nanotubes, , and various conductive polymers. , Magnetic loss materials mainly include elemental oxide or alloys of iron, cobalt, and nickel. , In practical applications, the two materials are often used in combination to achieve the ideal EMW absorption performance . However, this does not mean the more components of the material, the better its absorbing properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Magnetic loss materials mainly include elemental oxide or alloys of iron, cobalt, and nickel. 13,14 In practical applications, the two materials are often used in combination to achieve the ideal EMW absorption performance. 15 However, this does not mean the more components of the material, the better its absorbing properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the preparation of magnetic composite materials by compounding magnetic nanoparticles with carbon with good conductivity has become a research hotspot. Researchers have carried out a lot of work in this field, designing and preparing magnetic composite microspheres with core-shell [10], hollow [11], sandwich [12], flower-like [13][14][15] and bell-shaped [16] structures, as well as one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) composites with similar structures to wave absorbers [17]. On the basis of TCNFs, Zhang et al prepared magnetic wave absorbers with multi-shell heterostructures, including Fe@C [18], Fe/Fe 3 O 4 @TCNFs@TiO 2 [19] and TCF@Fe 3 O 4 @NCLs [20], and all of them showed excellent reflection loss and absorption bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%