Mogućnost zloupotrebe prava u postupku javnog nadmetanja za prodaju nekretnina u izvršnom postupku u pravu BiH

Abstract

The primary goal of the reformed enforcement law in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) is efficient compensation. However, many impediments exist. In this paper, the authors present some of the problems and potential abuses of procedural rights in the enforcement law of B&H. Two instances of abuse of rights regarding real estate are presented, which can open the doorway to other abuses, as well. Also, the abuse of procedural rights in the enforcement procedure is seen as underexplored in legislation, doctrine and case law. The paper addresses similarities and differences between the entities’ and the Brcko District legal systems regarding the presented abuses, as well as comparative law. It is focused on the analysis of legislation and the interpretation thereof in light of recent case law in B&H and problems arising from it. The identified problems often prevent the goal of the enforcement procedure from being fulfilled. The paper has two parts, each dealing with one instance of abuse. The first part concerns the engineering of the most favourable offer in the bidding. The second part concerns the problem of a fictional offer to purchase real estate in the bidding and the character of the deposit. The paper provides suggestions for amending legislation based on some good legal solutions in the region.

Denacionalizacija I Restitucija

“…Privatizacija državnog ka- Zakon o privatizaciji preduzeća Federacije BiH, 22 izvorno je predviđao, da predmeti koji trebaju biti restituirani nemogu biti predmetom privatizacije. 23 Nakon "uspješno" provedene privatizacije preduzeća i banaka zatim stambenih i poslovnih zgrada bitno je promijenjena vlasnička struktura na istima a da raniji vlasnici nisu obeštećeni niti im tko garantuje da će biti. Šarenolikost postojećih zakonskih rješenja sa ove vremenske distance određuje potencijalne obveznike na denacionalizaciju i restituciju na entitetskom nivou kao i za Brčko distrikt, 24 dok se očekuje rješavanje pitanja državne imovine a time i obveznika obeštećenja ranijih vlasnika.…”