2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moho, crustal architecture and deep deformation under the North Marmara Trough, from the SEISMARMARA Leg 1 offshore–onshore reflection–refraction survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
158
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
17
158
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Paleomagnetic directions in the west Anatolian extensional province are rotated clockwise [Piper et al, 2008], which we attribute to rotations associated with extension. The plate thickness in the east Anatolian contractional province is 40-50 km [Zor, 2008], in the central Anatolian Ova province 36-40 km thinning toward the southern edge [Zor, 2008], and in the west Anatolian extensional province spot thicknesses are generally in the range of 22-30 km [Tirel et al, 2004;Zhu et al, 2005], with a thickness of only 8 km in the Sea of Marmara [Bécel et al, 2009]. We assume that the thickness of the plate in the central Anatolian Ova province is approximately that of the whole region prior to the present tectonic regime (i.e., at least 13 Ma.).…”
Section: Driving Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleomagnetic directions in the west Anatolian extensional province are rotated clockwise [Piper et al, 2008], which we attribute to rotations associated with extension. The plate thickness in the east Anatolian contractional province is 40-50 km [Zor, 2008], in the central Anatolian Ova province 36-40 km thinning toward the southern edge [Zor, 2008], and in the west Anatolian extensional province spot thicknesses are generally in the range of 22-30 km [Tirel et al, 2004;Zhu et al, 2005], with a thickness of only 8 km in the Sea of Marmara [Bécel et al, 2009]. We assume that the thickness of the plate in the central Anatolian Ova province is approximately that of the whole region prior to the present tectonic regime (i.e., at least 13 Ma.).…”
Section: Driving Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crustal thickness ranges from 35 to 40 km along the North Anatolian Fault and shallows to 25-30 km in the Sea of Marmara region based on receiver functions and controlled source studies (Saunders et al, 1998;Sato et al, 2004;Zor et al, 2006;Laigle et al, 2008;Özacar et al, 2008;Bécel et al, 2009Bécel et al, , 2010Vanacore et al, 2013;Karabulut et al, 2013;Sodoudi et al, 2015). The lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary beneath the East Anatolian Accretionary Complex (EAAC) has been observed at 60-80 km depth based on Sreceiver functions (Angus et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). Those sediments are cut by north and south dipping faults with significant normal component of slip, as observed in high-resolution bathymetric maps Armijo et al, 2002;, deep-penetration seismic reflection and refraction data [Wong et al, 1995;Parke et al 1999;Carton et al, 2007;Laigle et al, 2008;Bécel et al, 2009; and 2-D and 3-D high resolution multichannel seismic data [Grall et al, 2012;Kurt et al, 2013]. At odds with the evidence for structural complexity and fault segmentation which appear to be fundamental features of the pull-apart system, Imren et al [2001; [2003] and Şengör et al [2005], among others, have alternatively interpreted the Marmara pull-apart system as a trough resulting mainly from the Western Anatolia N-S extensional regime during the middle Miocene.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 90%