2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jb016122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moho Depth Variations From Receiver Function Imaging in the Northeastern North China Craton and Its Tectonic Implications

Abstract: A detailed knowledge of the crustal thickness in the northeastern North China Craton (NCC) is important for understanding the unusual Phanerozoic destruction of the craton. We achieve this goal by employing a 2‐D wave equation‐based migration method to P receiver functions from 198 broadband seismic stations, using Ps conversions and surface‐reflected multiples. By combining receiver function images along 19 profiles, we constructed a high‐resolution Moho depth model for the northeastern NCC. The results prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(174 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along the BB′ line, the corresponding values were 37.54 km, 6.63 km/s, and 3.86 km/s. CCP images show that the Moho gradually deepens from east to west (Figures 9a and 9c) and from south to north (Figures 9b and 9d), consistent with the findings of previous studies (Chen et al, 2009;Zhang, Yao, et al, 2019;Zheng et al, 2007). E-W trending crustal changes may be related to the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate in the Mesozoic (Zhu et al, 2011), whereas S-N trending crustal changes may reflect S-N compressional deformation dating to the Jurassic and early Cretaceous (Davis et al, 2001;Meng, 2003).…”
Section: Snr ¼ 10 • Log 10supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Along the BB′ line, the corresponding values were 37.54 km, 6.63 km/s, and 3.86 km/s. CCP images show that the Moho gradually deepens from east to west (Figures 9a and 9c) and from south to north (Figures 9b and 9d), consistent with the findings of previous studies (Chen et al, 2009;Zhang, Yao, et al, 2019;Zheng et al, 2007). E-W trending crustal changes may be related to the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate in the Mesozoic (Zhu et al, 2011), whereas S-N trending crustal changes may reflect S-N compressional deformation dating to the Jurassic and early Cretaceous (Davis et al, 2001;Meng, 2003).…”
Section: Snr ¼ 10 • Log 10supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Conversions are primarily sensitive to changes in the Vs structure and depend weakly on the crustal Vp structure, whereas high‐frequency reflections (autocorrelation traces) provide high resolution of crustal Vp reflectors (e.g., sharp Moho). Reverberations from shallow low‐velocity layers (e.g., sediment or intracrustal anomaly) potentially interfere with Ps conversions but converted multiples (i.e., PpPs and PsPs + PpSs) and reflection phases (e.g., PpPp) can provide more robust images in these settings (e.g., Phạm & Tkalčić, 2017, 2018; Zhang et al., 2019). The influence of the source and path effects and simultaneous arrivals of multiple orders of reverberations have been a fundamental challenge in interpreting the autocorrelograms (e.g., Phạm & Tkalčić, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present crustal thickness (Feng et al, 2017;Y. H. Li et al, 2014;Han, 2020;P. Zhang et al, 2019) (Figure 2a) and lithospheric thickness (Y.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We chose the core area of the NCC extending from 108° to 118° in longitude and from 34° to 40°N in latitude (Figure 1) to investigate the spatiotemporal variations in deformation since the Paleozoic and when the lithospheric structures were still stable. The present crustal thickness (Feng et al., 2017; Y. H. Li et al., 2014; Han, 2020; P. Zhang et al., 2019) (Figure 2a) and lithospheric thickness (Y. Zhang et al., 2019) (Figure 2b) were constructed from P‐wave and S‐wave receiver functions at 1,732 stations. The current Moho temperature was obtained from a previous study (K. Wang et al., 2020) and presented in Figure 2c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation