2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moisture content and storage time influence the binding mechanisms in biofuel wood pellets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the decline was proportional over the whole range of moisture tested. Water is found to be the most important factor influencing pellet properties (Kaliyan & Morey, 2009;Laskowski et al, 2005;Nielsen et al, 2009;Samuelsson, Larsson, Thyrel, & Lestander, 2012). It can act as a lubricant that lowers the friction in the die resulting in low bulk density and as a binding agent that affects mechanical properties (Kaliyan & Morey, 2009).…”
Section: Pelletingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In both cases, the decline was proportional over the whole range of moisture tested. Water is found to be the most important factor influencing pellet properties (Kaliyan & Morey, 2009;Laskowski et al, 2005;Nielsen et al, 2009;Samuelsson, Larsson, Thyrel, & Lestander, 2012). It can act as a lubricant that lowers the friction in the die resulting in low bulk density and as a binding agent that affects mechanical properties (Kaliyan & Morey, 2009).…”
Section: Pelletingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The water also worked as a binder and strengthened the durability, but for this test series, the water content in the inlet material and in the produced pellets was almost constant (Table 1). Samuelsson et al (2012) showed that the durability has low sensitivity for changes in moisture content for wood pellets produced from fresh sawdust. As the moisture content cannot explain the differences in durability, the differences were due to the sugars that affect bonding during pelletising.…”
Section: Fig 1 Pellet Production Unit At Karlstad Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, pellet density and diametric compression strength were also used as the two indexes to evaluate the quality of WH pellets produced with different process parameters. During the densification of most biomass, the optimal moisture content of the raw material is between 8% and 16%, and the optimal process temperature is between 80 and 120 °C (Kashaninejad and Tabil 2011;Stelte et al 2011;Samuelsson et al 2012;Ståhl et al 2012). The center points and the edge points of the two process parameters were included in this study, such that the five variations in moisture content and temperature tested were 8%, 10%, 12%, 14%, and 16% and 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 °C, respectively.…”
Section: Preparation Of Pelletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass sources with different chemical compositions require different process parameters for their densification (Kashaninejad and Tabil 2011;Stelte et al 2011;Samuelsson et al 2012;Ståhl et al 2012). Moisture content and temperature are two important process parameters that greatly influence the quality of biomass fuel pellets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%