2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moisture sorption characteristics of tropical fresh water crayfish (Procambarus clarkii)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
42
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, in an atmosphere of constant relative humidity, the sample can absorb more moisture at lower than at higher temperature. Similar trends were observed for fish flour [14], freeze dried blue berries [15], tropical fresh water crayfish [12] and common beans flour [16].…”
Section: Effect Of Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, in an atmosphere of constant relative humidity, the sample can absorb more moisture at lower than at higher temperature. Similar trends were observed for fish flour [14], freeze dried blue berries [15], tropical fresh water crayfish [12] and common beans flour [16].…”
Section: Effect Of Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The isotherms exhibited sigmoid shapes described as type II in the isotherm classification [10,11] which presents a unique property of the ginger products. Type II isotherm describes adsorption on macroporous absorbents with strong adsorbate-adsorbent interaction [12]. Generally, the greater the non significance percentage differences in the mean comparisons indicated by the 2-tailed F-LSD test at 5% level of significance, the closer the similarity between the processing methods.…”
Section: Discussion Effect Of Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monolayer moisture content (M m ), represents the moisture content of the material when the entire surface is covered with a unimolecular moisture layer and the optimum moisture content for maximum shelf stability may be determined (Ariahu et al, 2006). Tables 2 and 3 show that the monolayer moisture contents in GAB were mildly higher than in BET model, and the Mm values decreased when temperature increased in both models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall assessment of all these values reveals that in the temperature range of 45 to 10 o C, the moisture uptake of food proteins falls in the range of 1.0 to 8.0g/100g dry basis. The observed decrease in moisture content with temperature range mentioned above may be due to reduction in number of active sites for water binding because of folding of macromolecular chains , thus causing a decrease in the number of active binding sites exposed (Ariahu et al, 2006). However this reasoning does not seem to be justified in the present study as the temperature range selected was 10 to 30°C.…”
Section: Fitting Of Isotherm Modelsmentioning
confidence: 69%