2022
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5116.3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular analysis of five controversial Balkanic species of Allolobophora (sensu lato) Eisen, 1873 (Lumbricidae, Clitellata) with emendation of the genus Cernosvitovia Omodeo, 1956

Abstract: Allolobophora (sensu lato) is one of the most controversial genera in the taxonomy of Lumbricidae. Due to its poor definition, this genus is plagued by extensive taxonomic confusion, and its generic composition and internal relationships have remained uncertain, especially in species of the Balkan Peninsula. In this study, we have combined the study of morphological data and molecular phylogenetics based on five genetic markers, regions of the nuclear 28S rRNA and mitochondrial 16S rRNA, 12S rRNA, NADH dehydro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors proposed to divide it into Allolobophora sensu stricto and Allolobophora sensu lato (Bouché 1972; Easton 1983; Csuzdi & Zicsi 2003) . Marchán et al (2021) elevated the subgenus Gatesona proposed by Qiu & Bouché (1998a) to the genus level, and Popović et al (2022) assigned several Balkanic Allolobophora species to a redefined Cernosvitovia Omodeo, 1956. Later, Martínez Navarro et al (2023) separated the genus Allolobophora into four distinct genera and synonymised the genus Heraclescolex with Allolobophora .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors proposed to divide it into Allolobophora sensu stricto and Allolobophora sensu lato (Bouché 1972; Easton 1983; Csuzdi & Zicsi 2003) . Marchán et al (2021) elevated the subgenus Gatesona proposed by Qiu & Bouché (1998a) to the genus level, and Popović et al (2022) assigned several Balkanic Allolobophora species to a redefined Cernosvitovia Omodeo, 1956. Later, Martínez Navarro et al (2023) separated the genus Allolobophora into four distinct genera and synonymised the genus Heraclescolex with Allolobophora .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These taxonomic acts and the phylogenetic analyses that support them highlight the artificial character of the “catch-all” group Allolobophora ( sensu lato ), which is progressively split into several smaller monophyletic genera generally comprising species of restricted geographical distribution. There are still several Balkanic species of Allolobophora which likely belong to Cernosvitovia due to their morphological and biogeographic affinities (see Popović et al 2022), but others such as Allolobophora asconensis Bretscher, 1900, Allolobophora festae Rosa, 1892, Allolobophora marcuzzii Omodeo, 1952 or Allolobophora schneideri Michaelsen, 1900 (which are Italian species) or the Caucasian Allolobophora pseudonematogena Perel, 1967, Allolobophora brunnecephala Kvavadze, 1985 and Allolobophora immaculata Omodeo & Rota, 1989 are more controversial: a strong effort to include these species in molecular phylogenetic analyses would allow to revise Allolobophora ( sensu lato ) once and for all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%