2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-009-9244-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular analysis of Ixodes granulatus, a possible vector tick for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Taiwan

Abstract: The genetic identity of Ixodes granulatus ticks was determined for the first time in Taiwan. The phylogenetic relationships were analyzed by comparing the sequences of mitochondrial 16S ribosomal DNA gene obtained from 19 strains of ticks representing seven species of Ixodes and two outgroup species (Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Haemaphysalis inermis). Four major clades could be easily distinguished by neighbour-joining analysis and were congruent by maximum-parsimony method. All these I. granulatus ticks of T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the intra-specific sequence variation in Dermacentor marginatus was 0.1-1.0% for p cox 1 (732 bp) and 0.2-1.2% for p nad 5 (519 bp) 43, and in Haemaphysalis punctata it was 0.4-1.9% for p cox 1 and 0.4-1.0% for p nad 5 43, and intra-specific sequence variation in Ixodes holocyclus and I. cornuatus was less than 0.86% for p cox 1 (640 bp) 46. However, comparison of the p cox 1 and p cyt b sequences between RSC and RSU revealed significantly high level of difference (10.8-11.5% for p cox 1 and 10.4-11.4% for p cyt b), consistent with previous studies of other Ixodes ticks, where inter-specific sequence variation was 9.1-16.0% for cox 1 46, and 13.0% for cox 1 47, and 4.2-14.1% for rrn L 48. In spite of the molecular evidence here supporting the RSC and RSU as distinct tick species, interpretation from present study needs to be somewhat caution until detailed population genetic studies have been carried out on samples from broader geographical localities to better illuminate the taxonomy and population genetic structures of R. sanguineus ticks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, the intra-specific sequence variation in Dermacentor marginatus was 0.1-1.0% for p cox 1 (732 bp) and 0.2-1.2% for p nad 5 (519 bp) 43, and in Haemaphysalis punctata it was 0.4-1.9% for p cox 1 and 0.4-1.0% for p nad 5 43, and intra-specific sequence variation in Ixodes holocyclus and I. cornuatus was less than 0.86% for p cox 1 (640 bp) 46. However, comparison of the p cox 1 and p cyt b sequences between RSC and RSU revealed significantly high level of difference (10.8-11.5% for p cox 1 and 10.4-11.4% for p cyt b), consistent with previous studies of other Ixodes ticks, where inter-specific sequence variation was 9.1-16.0% for cox 1 46, and 13.0% for cox 1 47, and 4.2-14.1% for rrn L 48. In spite of the molecular evidence here supporting the RSC and RSU as distinct tick species, interpretation from present study needs to be somewhat caution until detailed population genetic studies have been carried out on samples from broader geographical localities to better illuminate the taxonomy and population genetic structures of R. sanguineus ticks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast the H. asiaticum is more departed having 7.3% to 13.8% divergence from these species ( Table 5). As for H. dromedarii and H. detritum that cluster with H. asiaticum in the phylogenetic trees, H. asiaticum shows 7.65% and 7.84% divergence which is in agreement with between species differences reported earlier for Rhipicephalus and Ixodes species (Song et al, 2011;Apanaskevich et al, 2011;Chao et al, 2009).…”
Section: Estimating Divergence Timesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Ixodes granulatus was the most common tick species found in both study areas as this species was known to infest mammalian hosts such as rodents, and shrews (Nadchatram 2008;Chao et al 2009;2011;Madinah et al 2011;Ernieenor et al 2016). I. granulatus have been reported to host and possibly transmit a number of tick-borne pathogens, including Rickettsia and Borrelia (Kollars et al 2001;Graves & Stenos 2003;Chao et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%