1997
DOI: 10.1128/jb.179.15.4795-4801.1997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular analysis of kanamycin and viomycin resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis by use of the conjugation system

Abstract: We examined the molecular mechanisms of resistance to kanamycin and viomycin in Mycobacterium smegmatis. All of the M. smegmatis strains with high-level kanamycin resistance had a nucleotide substitution from A to G at position 1389 of the 16S rRNA gene (rrs). This position is equivalent to position 1408 of Escherichia coli, and mutation at this position is known to cause aminoglycoside resistance. Mutations from G to A or G to T at position 1473 of the M. smegmatis rrs gene were found in viomycin-resistant mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(50 reference statements)
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We anticipate that this conjugal system will improve the genetic versatility of M. smegmatis, and mc 2 155 in particular, and facilitate the characterization of the mycobacterial genome. In fact, the utility of this system was demonstrated by the ability to transfer auxotrophic markers between strains (Mizuguchi and Tokunaga, 1971) and, more recently, by the ability to mobilize resistance markers between strains as shown here and demonstrated by Taniguchi et al (1997).…”
Section: Chromosomal Transfer Is Extensivementioning
confidence: 74%
“…We anticipate that this conjugal system will improve the genetic versatility of M. smegmatis, and mc 2 155 in particular, and facilitate the characterization of the mycobacterial genome. In fact, the utility of this system was demonstrated by the ability to transfer auxotrophic markers between strains (Mizuguchi and Tokunaga, 1971) and, more recently, by the ability to mobilize resistance markers between strains as shown here and demonstrated by Taniguchi et al (1997).…”
Section: Chromosomal Transfer Is Extensivementioning
confidence: 74%
“…In several research studies, low-level KAN R strains differ from high-level KAN R strains by both lacking rrs mutations and cross-resistance to other ribosome binding drugs, including AMK (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). The prevalence of mutations in the eis promoter in 79% of the low-level KAN R clinical isolates studied and absence from the KAN S isolates studied suggests that these mutations account for much of the observed low-level KAN resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in the 16S rRNA gene, rrs, can cause high-level resistance to KAN [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) Ն80 g/mL], and some mutations can confer crossresistance to other second-line drugs, including amikacin (AMK) and capreomycin (CAP) (6). However, up to 80% of KAN-resistant (KAN R ) clinical isolates display low-level resistance to KAN (5 g/mL Ͻ MIC Ͻ 80 g/mL), do not contain rrs mutations, and do not exhibit cross-resistance (7)(8)(9)(10). The molecular basis of this low-level resistance is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rRNA methyltransferase modifies nucleotide C1409 in helix 44 of 16S rRNA and nucleotide C1920 in helix 69 of 23S rRNA [119]. Additionally, mutations in the rrs gene that encodes the 16S rRNA are also associated with resistance to VM and CPM, specifically a G→T nucleotide changes at codon 1484 [120,121]. Cross-resistance can be found between KM, AMK, CPM and VM [6].…”
Section: Second Line Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%