1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4758(99)01439-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Analysis of Nematode Diversity and the Evolution of Parasitism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
111
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
111
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent molecular characterization of rDNA and ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences 496 R.M. Kaplan suggests that genetic divergence between taxa in the Strongylida is remarkably low [13,26]. In contrast, studies comparing mDNA sequences suggest that the genetic diversity within-populations of individual trichostrongyle species is quite large [7].…”
Section: Resistance To Ivermectinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent molecular characterization of rDNA and ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences 496 R.M. Kaplan suggests that genetic divergence between taxa in the Strongylida is remarkably low [13,26]. In contrast, studies comparing mDNA sequences suggest that the genetic diversity within-populations of individual trichostrongyle species is quite large [7].…”
Section: Resistance To Ivermectinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot preclude the possibility that nematodes were present in the mining water at the time the borehole was drilled a year prior to sampling, but this seems unlikely given the disinfection procedures are standard operating protocols. Because the nematodes were parthenogenetic, crossing with surface species was impossible, and nematode morphology and genetics cannot be used as indicators of long-term isolation 11,12 . Further evaluation of their indigeneity, therefore, relied upon environmental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar problem has been reported with the use of molecular data where identifying positional homology has been a major hindrance to their use in reconstructing phylogeny among taxa . Although it is evidently much easier to identify and quantify sequence evolution than morphological evolution (De Ley, 2000), DNA data when used alone may be subject to some amount of noise and artefact (Dorris et al, 1999). In view of this, Dayrat (2005) proposed a more holistic approach to describing biodiversity which involves the integration of as much data about the organism as possible.…”
Section: Classical Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%