1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular analysis of two putative tumour suppressor genes, PTEN and DMBT, which have been implicated in glioblastoma multiforme disease progression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Somatic alterations in genome structure affecting the DMBT1 gene region and loss of DMBT1 gene expression have been observed in glioblastomas, medulloblastomas (Mollenhauer et al, 1997) and in non-CNS tumors such as lung cancers (Takeshita et al, 1999;Wu et al, 1999) and GI tumors (Mori et al, 1999). In malignant astrocytic tumors further studies confirmed either hemizygous or homozygous alterations (Fujisawa et al, 1999;Sasaki et al, 2001;Somerville et al, 1998;Steck et al, 1999). So far, systematic analysis of the entire coding region of DMBT1 in tumors has not yet been performed since either distinct regions could not be amplified (Petersen et al, 2000), major portions of the gene were not included (Takeshita et al, 1999) or the primer design allowed simultaneous amplification of multiple amplicons in the highly repetitive regions of DMBT1 (Wu et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Somatic alterations in genome structure affecting the DMBT1 gene region and loss of DMBT1 gene expression have been observed in glioblastomas, medulloblastomas (Mollenhauer et al, 1997) and in non-CNS tumors such as lung cancers (Takeshita et al, 1999;Wu et al, 1999) and GI tumors (Mori et al, 1999). In malignant astrocytic tumors further studies confirmed either hemizygous or homozygous alterations (Fujisawa et al, 1999;Sasaki et al, 2001;Somerville et al, 1998;Steck et al, 1999). So far, systematic analysis of the entire coding region of DMBT1 in tumors has not yet been performed since either distinct regions could not be amplified (Petersen et al, 2000), major portions of the gene were not included (Takeshita et al, 1999) or the primer design allowed simultaneous amplification of multiple amplicons in the highly repetitive regions of DMBT1 (Wu et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…25 The possible factors that cause lack of DMBT1 expression are still unclear. Somerville et al 22 suggested that homozygous loss at 74k STS, located at the N-terminal position of DMBT1, can be related with lack of DMBT1 expression because of its putative vicinity with the promoter. By contrast, Sasaki et al 41 have recently reported that homozygous lack at 74k may not be a real loss of DMBT1 sequence, but also an artifact generated by a sequence polymorphism at that region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence-tagged site (STS) c12 (190 bp) located on chromosome 8 was chosen as an internal control. 22 H4 cell line DNA, homozygously deleted at the DMBT1 STS g14, was used as a positive control for differential PCR. We could not find any other positive controls for the rest of the DMBT1 STSs.…”
Section: Pten and Dmbt1 Homozygous Deletionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We previously reported that mutations in the PTEN gene, which is located on 10q23, are common (32%) in primary but rare (4%) in secondary glioblastomas (Tohma et al, 1998). DMBT1 is deleted frequently in glioblastomas (Mollenhauer et al, 1997;Somerville et al, 1998) but DMBT1 mutations have not yet been identified. Although growth suppression has been observed after microcell-mediated transfer of chromosome fragments from 10p14 -15 into T98G glioblastoma cells (Kon et al, 1998), the putative tumor suppressor gene at this locus has not yet been identified.…”
Section: Fujisawa Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%