2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2019.101930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular analysis reveals expansion of Fasciola hepatica distribution from Afghanistan to China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PEPCK was established as one of the reliable nuclear markers for species identification of Fasciola spp. (Thang et al, 2019), and it has been proposed as an egg antigen in S. mansoni (Asahi et al, 2000). Our group also identified PEPCK as an immunodominant antigen recognized by sera from F. hepatica infected patients (Marcilla et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…PEPCK was established as one of the reliable nuclear markers for species identification of Fasciola spp. (Thang et al, 2019), and it has been proposed as an egg antigen in S. mansoni (Asahi et al, 2000). Our group also identified PEPCK as an immunodominant antigen recognized by sera from F. hepatica infected patients (Marcilla et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Several previous reports attempted to identify the species of Fasciola flukes from these regions using morphological and morphometric features as well as conventional molecular markers (nuclear internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2) (Anh et al., 2018 ; Ichikawa & Itagaki, 2010 ; Ichikawa‐Seki, Ortiz, et al., 2016 ; Mizani et al., 2015 ; Teofanova et al., 2011 ); however, these findings have not been validated using more reliable nuclear gene markers. Recently, the nuclear genes, phosphoenol pyruvate carboxykinase (pepck) and DNA polymerase delta (pold), were found to be useful novel markers for the precise discrimination of F. hepatica, F. gigantica and hybrid Fasciola flukes without the need for gene sequencing that is expensive and not cost‐effective, particularly in the endemic countries (Hayashi et al., 2018 ; Hayashi, Ichikawa‐Seki, et al., 2016 ; Kasahara et al., 2021 ; Tang et al., 2016 ; Thang et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 1312 Fasciola flukes (470 F. hepatica, 609 F. gigantica, and 233 hybrid Fasciola) from 11 countries (Afghanistan, Algeria, Peru, Spain, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Uganda, Japan, and Bangladesh) [8,9,11,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] were used in the present study. Fragment analyses of nuclear pepck and pold and the nucleotide sequencing of mitochondrial nad1 have been performed in previous studies [8,9,11,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Discrepancies between pepck and pold were observed among 7, 19, 6, 27, and 15 Fasciola isolates from Afghanistan, Algeria, Peru, Spain, and Nigeria, respectively.…”
Section: Fasciola Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although discrimination errors in the fragment pattern analysis of the multiplex PCR for pepck have been reported in F. hepatica isolates from Afghanistan [8], Algeria [9], Ecuador [10], and Spain [11], subsequent nucleotide sequencing of DNA fragment of pepck enabled precise species identification. Regarding pold, discrimination errors were observed in F. gigantica isolates from Nigeria [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%