2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-014-9478-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular, anatomical and functional changes in the retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve crush in mice

Abstract: Decrease in pSTR likely reflected the early loss of RGC function after ONC and that declining expression of RGC-specific genes preceded anatomical and functional changes in the RGCs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with reports from other groups, 42,49,50 ONC resulted in a significant reduction of pSTR amplitudes in vehicle-treated mice at 7 days after axonal injury. However, this reduction was significantly attenuated by AMG487 treatment ( Figure 5, B and C).…”
Section: Pharmacological Blockade Of Cxcr3 Partially Prevents Rgc Dyssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with reports from other groups, 42,49,50 ONC resulted in a significant reduction of pSTR amplitudes in vehicle-treated mice at 7 days after axonal injury. However, this reduction was significantly attenuated by AMG487 treatment ( Figure 5, B and C).…”
Section: Pharmacological Blockade Of Cxcr3 Partially Prevents Rgc Dyssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Comparing RGC numbers to function can be difficult as certain RGC phenotypic markers are more intimately linked to dysfunction than others. For example, whereas RBPMS is strongly associated with functional and dysfunction RGC alike(Rodriguez et al, 2014), Brn3a down-regulates following injury, even preceding the reduction in pSTR amplitude and thus presumably marks the early stages of RGC dysfunction(Yukita et al, 2015). Neuroprotection of RGC does not reverse RGC dysfunction, particularly if the IOP is still raised(Mead et al, 2016).…”
Section: Functional Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, 1) Optic nerve transection/crush resulting in selective RGC loss invariably cause dramatic loss of PERG signal in cats (Maffei and Fiorentini, 1981; Weber et al, 2008) monkeys (Gianfranceschi et al, 1999) rats(Berardi et al, 1990) and mice (Miura et al, 2009; Porciatti et al, 1996; Xia et al, 2014); pSTR and nSTR appear to be reduced in rats (Bui and Fortune, 2004) and mice (Liu et al, 2014; Smith et al, 2014; Yukita et al, 2015), but relatively less than the PERG (Liu et al, 2014); PhNR, OPs do not seem to be reduced in rats and mice (Li et al, 2005; Liu et al, 2014; Smith et al, 2014); in monkeys, retrograde RGC degeneration modestly alters the mfERG, and mfERG alterations are species-dependent (Nork et al, 2010), 2) Several pharmacological studies have demonstrated that interfering in various ways with activity of inner retina neurons reduces PERG as well as innerretina-sensitive ERG components in cats, rodents and primates(Bui and Fortune, 2004; Hare and Ton, 2002; Hood et al, 1999; Viswanathan et al, 2000). Interestingly, both spiking and non-spiking electrical activity contributes to the PERG and inner-retina-sensitive ERG components (Luo and Frishman, 2011; Miura et al, 2009; Trimarchi et al, 1990) (Harrison et al, 2006; Viswanathan et al, 2000), 3) Intraretinal recordings have demonstrated an inner retina origin for the PERG distinct from ERG b-wave (Baker et al, 1988; Sieving and Steinberg, 1987), 4) In the mouse, the bioelectrical field generated by the PERG is different from that of the Flash-ERG, and it is consistent with generators localized in the optic nerve head (Chou and Porciatti, 2012), 5) Functional retrograde transport of target-derived factors is necessary for PERG generation, as blocking axon transport in the optic nerve Chou (Chou et al, 2013) or lesioning the superior colliculus (Yang et al, 2013) impairs the PERG in the mouse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%