Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BACKGROUND: In recent years, autologous serum has been increasingly used in the treatment of macular hole. The study carried out a biological analysis of autologous serum obtained by various methods. AIM: The aim of the investigation is to compare the cellular and biochemical composition of autologous serum obtained using different methods for use in the macular hole treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study of the number of platelets, leukocytes and fibrinogen level in the blood serum of 24 patients obtained by centrifugation in original systems for harvesting autologous serum and laboratory test tubes was performed. RESULTS: The indices of P-PRP obtained in the Arthrex ACP system and in a laboratory test tube do not statistically differ in quantitative indices of fibrinogen and platelets (p 0.05), and differ in the content of leukocytes (p 0.05) in the direction of increasing the number of leukocytes in the substrate obtained in a laboratory test tube. The indicators of L-PRP obtained in the Ycellbio-Kit system and in a laboratory test tube do not statistically differ in the amount of fibrinogen (p 0.05) and differ in the content of platelets and leukocytes (p 0.05) in the direction of decreasing the concentration of leukocytes and platelets in the autologous serum obtained in a laboratory test tube. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, autologous serum obtained in the Arthrex ACP system is of great interest for macular hole surgery due to the minimal content of leukocytes, the closed character of the system, and the best coagulation properties of the substrate obtained. Laboratory test tubes may be considered a more affordable alternative for the production of autologous serum (P-PRP) for the treatment of macular hole. The autologous serum (L-PRP) obtained in the Ycellbio-Kit system and in a laboratory test tube is less suitable for macular hole surgery according to its composition.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, autologous serum has been increasingly used in the treatment of macular hole. The study carried out a biological analysis of autologous serum obtained by various methods. AIM: The aim of the investigation is to compare the cellular and biochemical composition of autologous serum obtained using different methods for use in the macular hole treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study of the number of platelets, leukocytes and fibrinogen level in the blood serum of 24 patients obtained by centrifugation in original systems for harvesting autologous serum and laboratory test tubes was performed. RESULTS: The indices of P-PRP obtained in the Arthrex ACP system and in a laboratory test tube do not statistically differ in quantitative indices of fibrinogen and platelets (p 0.05), and differ in the content of leukocytes (p 0.05) in the direction of increasing the number of leukocytes in the substrate obtained in a laboratory test tube. The indicators of L-PRP obtained in the Ycellbio-Kit system and in a laboratory test tube do not statistically differ in the amount of fibrinogen (p 0.05) and differ in the content of platelets and leukocytes (p 0.05) in the direction of decreasing the concentration of leukocytes and platelets in the autologous serum obtained in a laboratory test tube. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, autologous serum obtained in the Arthrex ACP system is of great interest for macular hole surgery due to the minimal content of leukocytes, the closed character of the system, and the best coagulation properties of the substrate obtained. Laboratory test tubes may be considered a more affordable alternative for the production of autologous serum (P-PRP) for the treatment of macular hole. The autologous serum (L-PRP) obtained in the Ycellbio-Kit system and in a laboratory test tube is less suitable for macular hole surgery according to its composition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.