2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and morphological incongruence in European species of Isothecium (Bryophyta)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Draper et al, 2007;Grimm et al, 2007;Grimm and Denk, 2008;Kocyan et al, 2008) present bootstrap support values calculated following the findings of Müller (2005b), that increased search effort beyond the use of one simple addition search with TBR branch swapping do not affect bootstrap support values. However, none of these studies test whether this holds true for their dataset although it is known that the outcome of bootstrap analyses may be highly dataset dependent (DeBry and Olmstead, 2000;Mort et al, 2000;Sanderson and Wojciechowski, 2000).…”
Section: Parsimony Analyses and Monophyly Testingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Draper et al, 2007;Grimm et al, 2007;Grimm and Denk, 2008;Kocyan et al, 2008) present bootstrap support values calculated following the findings of Müller (2005b), that increased search effort beyond the use of one simple addition search with TBR branch swapping do not affect bootstrap support values. However, none of these studies test whether this holds true for their dataset although it is known that the outcome of bootstrap analyses may be highly dataset dependent (DeBry and Olmstead, 2000;Mort et al, 2000;Sanderson and Wojciechowski, 2000).…”
Section: Parsimony Analyses and Monophyly Testingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Thus, the evolutionary history of E. prolixum has to be discussed in the course of phylogenetic analyses of Isothecium and the Lembophyllaceae in general. However, recent molecular data were partly incongruent with the morphological circumscription of Isothecium species (Draper et al 2007), and further molecular analyses including E. prolixum have to be carried out to infer its affinities and taxonomic status.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bousquet et al 1992), but often incongruence has been encountered (e.g. Geisler 2001, Masters & Brothers 2002, Jousselin et al 2004, Draper et al 2007). Although incongruence between morphological and molecular results was initially considered a negative homoplasious result, it has actually opened a new window in terms of understanding the evolution of morphological characters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%